Affiliation:
1. Senior Research Fellow, PhD Law Institute of Lithuanian Centre for Social Sciences ( Lithuania )
Abstract
Abstract
The paper discusses the problem of non-recognition of civil confiscation orders in Europe. Despite the breakthrough in international cooperation in the freezing and confiscation of crime proceeds in the criminal law domain, the formal approach in some European states destroys the potential of one of the most advanced instruments against crime proceeds—civil confiscation orders. The study offers a comparative analysis of the concepts of the confiscation of crime proceeds within and outside the frameworks of criminal proceedings. The analysis serves as the basis for the discussion of whether there is reasonable ground for the formal distinction between these concepts.
The author concludes that the formal elimination of the civil confiscation orders has no substantial background. The analysis of both extended powers of confiscation in the criminal law domain in Europe and the Lithuanian Law on Civil Confiscation in the light of principles of proportionality and fair proceedings shows that civil confiscation regimes outside the framework of criminal proceedings may provide adequate safeguards to those provided in the confiscation regimes within criminal proceedings.
The paper contributes to the discussion that is relevant to any European state that considers enacting or amending the civil confiscation legal framework or the legal regulation on recognising and executing crime proceeds confiscation orders. The paper elaborates on the approach that could enhance cooperation among European states in the prevention of organised crime.
Subject
Law,Sociology and Political Science
Reference10 articles.
1. 1. Bikelis, Skirmantas. “Modeling the Patterns of Civil Confiscation: Balancing Effectiveness, Proportionality and the Right to Be Presumed Innocent.” Baltic Journal of Law & Politics 13:2 (2020): 24–48 // https://doi.org/10.2478/bjlp-2020-0010.
2. 2. Bikelis, Skirmantas, and Simonas Mikšys. Civilinio turto konfiskavimo perspektyvos Lietuvoje (Prospect of Civil Confiscation in Lithuania). Vilnius: Lietuvos teisės institutas, 2019.
3. 3. Boucht, Johan. The Limits of Asset Confiscation. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2017.
4. 4. Bullock, Karen. “Criminal benefit, the confiscation order and the post-conviction confiscation regime.” Crime Law and Social Change Vol. 62(1) (2014): 45–64 // DOI: 10.1007/s10611-014-9517-7.
5. 5. Korte, Matthias. “Vermögensabschöpfung reloaded.” Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Steuerstrafrecht No. 1 (2018): 1–12.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献