Label V. Content: The Problem of Non-Recognition of Civil Confiscation Orders in Europe

Author:

Bikelis Skirmantas1

Affiliation:

1. Senior Research Fellow, PhD Law Institute of Lithuanian Centre for Social Sciences ( Lithuania )

Abstract

Abstract The paper discusses the problem of non-recognition of civil confiscation orders in Europe. Despite the breakthrough in international cooperation in the freezing and confiscation of crime proceeds in the criminal law domain, the formal approach in some European states destroys the potential of one of the most advanced instruments against crime proceeds—civil confiscation orders. The study offers a comparative analysis of the concepts of the confiscation of crime proceeds within and outside the frameworks of criminal proceedings. The analysis serves as the basis for the discussion of whether there is reasonable ground for the formal distinction between these concepts. The author concludes that the formal elimination of the civil confiscation orders has no substantial background. The analysis of both extended powers of confiscation in the criminal law domain in Europe and the Lithuanian Law on Civil Confiscation in the light of principles of proportionality and fair proceedings shows that civil confiscation regimes outside the framework of criminal proceedings may provide adequate safeguards to those provided in the confiscation regimes within criminal proceedings. The paper contributes to the discussion that is relevant to any European state that considers enacting or amending the civil confiscation legal framework or the legal regulation on recognising and executing crime proceeds confiscation orders. The paper elaborates on the approach that could enhance cooperation among European states in the prevention of organised crime.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Law,Sociology and Political Science

Reference10 articles.

1. 1. Bikelis, Skirmantas. “Modeling the Patterns of Civil Confiscation: Balancing Effectiveness, Proportionality and the Right to Be Presumed Innocent.” Baltic Journal of Law & Politics 13:2 (2020): 24–48 // https://doi.org/10.2478/bjlp-2020-0010.

2. 2. Bikelis, Skirmantas, and Simonas Mikšys. Civilinio turto konfiskavimo perspektyvos Lietuvoje (Prospect of Civil Confiscation in Lithuania). Vilnius: Lietuvos teisės institutas, 2019.

3. 3. Boucht, Johan. The Limits of Asset Confiscation. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2017.

4. 4. Bullock, Karen. “Criminal benefit, the confiscation order and the post-conviction confiscation regime.” Crime Law and Social Change Vol. 62(1) (2014): 45–64 // DOI: 10.1007/s10611-014-9517-7.

5. 5. Korte, Matthias. “Vermögensabschöpfung reloaded.” Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Steuerstrafrecht No. 1 (2018): 1–12.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3