The Price of Medical Negligence – Should it Be Judged by the Criminal Court in the Context of the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights?

Author:

Pranka Darius1

Affiliation:

1. Research Fellow, Dr., Judge, Law Institute of Lithuania ( Lithuania ), Vilnius Regional Court

Abstract

Abstract The article deals with a recently relevant issue – whether a doctor who has made an error or was negligent during his or her professional activity that has resulted in injury or death should be prosecuted, whether this type of liability is not too strict, and whether it is proportionate and adequate to the specificities of the medical profession. From the point of view of criminal justice in Lithuania, this topic has not been investigated at all. The courts hear such criminal cases without any exceptions for doctors. However, in an international level, the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights or investigations in other states suggest that criminal liability is not always a binding legal consequence in such cases. After having analysed and summarised the case-law of the said court, by taking into account the insights of foreign authors, the danger of medical error and ultima ratio principle, the author raises the idea that the current practice in civil medical negligence when doctors are prosecuted for simple negligence should be changed.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Law,Sociology and Political Science

Reference26 articles.

1. 1. Abramavičius, Armanas, and Andželika Vosyliūtė. “Qualification of negligent homicide in the practice of the Supreme Court of Lithuania.” Law Review 2 (18 (2018): 176–190.

2. 2. Crosby, Cath. “Gross Negligence Manslaughter Revisited: Time for a Change of Direction?” The Journal of Criminal Law 84(3) (2020): 228–245.

3. 3. Dambrauskienė, Aušra. Implementation of the ultima ratio principle in criminalising acts in the criminal code of the Republic of Lithuania. Doctoral Dissertation. Vilnius, 2017.

4. 4. Glauser, Wendy. “Should medical errors ever be considered criminal offences?” CMAJ 190 (2018): E518-E519.

5. 5. Hamilton, Leslie. “Independent review of gross negligence manslaughter and culpable homicide” (2019) // https://www.gmc-uk.org/-/media/documents/independent-review-of-gross-negligence-manslaughter-and-culpable-homicide---final-report_pd-78716610.pdf

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3