Potential Legal Challenges for Blockchain Technology in Competition Law

Author:

Hutchinson Christophe S.1,Egorova Maria A.2

Affiliation:

1. Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation , Department of Legal Regulation of Economic Activities ( Russian Federation )

2. Kutafin Moscow State Law University , International Cooperation Department ( Russian Federation )

Abstract

Abstract Since decentralized organizations such as blockchain are not recognized as legal persons, questions arise regarding the ability to detect anti-competitive practices and their perpetrators. Under certain circumstances, if a competitor is unreasonably refused in access to technology, it may well be interpreted as creating an obstacle to his/her entry into the market, which may constitute a violation of the legislation of a country on the protection of economic competition. The exchange of information between players of the same market can present antitrust risks if it helps to fix prices for their products/services or to establish other forms of coordination between such players. The purpose of this study is to provide a description of current EU anticompetitive practices in the field of blockchain-technologies application, as well as to identify challenges in the EU antitrust law related to the emergence of blockchain. This article highlights the challenges blockchain poses for analyzing unilateral anti-competitive practices. This study suggests that EU competition law has a lack of operational and measurement tools to map competitive interactions taking place outside the relevant market, which could lead to rather short-sighted competition law enforcement focusing only on horizontal competition restrictions on relevant markets. The relevance of the topic is associated with the fact that the increased popularity of the use of blockchain technology requires an answer to the question of its legal nature and inclusion in the legal field in order to balance the interests of all parties to economic and legal relations.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Law,Sociology and Political Science

Reference73 articles.

1. 1. Abramowicz, Michael. “Cryptocurrency-Based Law.” Arizona Law Review 58 (2016): 359-420.

2. 2. Bradley, Robert. “On the Origins of the Sherman Antitrust Act.” Cato Journal 9 (1990): 737–742.

3. 3. Champagne, Phil. The book of Satoshi: The collected writings of Bitcoin creator Satoshi Nakamoto. USA: e53 Publishing, 2014.

4. 4. Comm’n of The European Communities, “Guidance on the Commission’s Enforcement Priorities in Applying Article 82 Ec Treaty to Abusive Exclusionary Conduct by Dominant Undertakings,” Official Journal of the European Union (Dec. 3, 2008) // https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A52009XC0224%2801%29.

5. 5. Cong, Lin, and Zhiguo He. “Blockchain Disruption and Smart Contracts.” The Review of Financial Studies 32 (2018): 1754-1797.10.1093/rfs/hhz007

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3