Political Communication and Deliberative Democracy

Author:

Čabraja Toni1

Affiliation:

1. 1 PhD student, SKM Alma Mater Europaea , Slovenia

Abstract

Abstract The problem of political abstention of voters leaves democratic institutions without content. That is why the role of political communication in the context of the essential development of democracy is becoming very relevant today. We are interested in how deliberative communication, as a model of political communication, is connected with the mobilization of voters in political processes, which is how democracy is realized. The meaning of deliberatization is based on the idea of bringing stakeholders closer to a consensus through a free and equal dialogue of political communication in the communication community. In this way, a better legitimacy of political decisions is achieved. It is a process of discursive political communication that "creates and maintains" the actions of the government. The research question of our article was how scientific and professional theory look at the role of deliberative communication, as a model of political communication, in the process of political participation of political stakeholders in the communication community today. We assumed (the hypothesis) that scientific theory looks optimistically at the role of deliberative communication. In the article, we used the descriptive method and the method of analysing scientific and professional texts. We carried out the research with a review of domestic and foreign editions of professional books, monographic publications, original scientific articles, and research results. We obtained data using the Cobiss and Google Scholar databases. The results of the research showed that scientific theory views deliberative communication as a promising experiment and evolution in the realization of deliberative democracy..

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Materials Chemistry,Economics and Econometrics,Media Technology,Forestry

Reference45 articles.

1. Aristotel, (1970 ). Politika, Kultura, Beograd.

2. Asen, R. (2015). Democracy, deliberation, and education. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.

3. Bächtiger, A. and Steenbergen, M. R. (2004). The Real World of Deliberation. A Comparative Study of its Favorable Conditions in Legislatures. EUI Working Paper SPS No. 2004717. Published in Italy.

4. Bohman, J. (1996). Public deliberation: pluralism, complexity, and democracy. The MIT Press.

5. Crouch, C. (2007). Postdemokracíja, Izbori sutrašnjice, Zagreb.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3