Affiliation:
1. Prague University of Economics and Business , Czech Republic
Abstract
Abstract
In this paper, we explore the drawbacks of GDP per capita in purchasing power parity as an indicator of economic development and well-being and evaluate the factors which diminish its ability to represent the level of life. Firstly, we theoretically outline the issues that might be undermining the suitability of GDP per capita as a measure of well-being, and debate other development indicators. Subsequently, we confront GDP per capita with the most well-known development indicator – the Human Development Index HDI – and calculate the deviations between these two indicators for a panel of 141 countries. To empirically evaluate the potential limitations of GDP in measuring development, we regress the computed deviations between development and GDP on an array of economic, social, and political variables employing a heterogeneous panel dataset and robust fixed effects estimators. The results reveal that countries with higher income inequality and level of economic freedom are characterised by lower development than implied by their GDP per capita. Contrarily, the size of the shadow economy is negatively linked to the deviations of HDI from GDP. Certain sociocultural, geographic, and ecological factors, such as higher fertility rates, cold climate, and the depletion of natural resources, are prevalent among nations ranking higher in GDP per capita than in development.
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Reference24 articles.
1. ARELLANO, M., (1987). Computing Robust Standard Errors for Within Group Estimators. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 49: 431–434. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.1987.mp49004006.x10.1111/j.1468-0084.1987.mp49004006.x
2. ATKINSON G., MARLIER, A. C., (2015). Monitoring the evolution of income poverty and real incomes over time. CASE Papers, 2015(188). London: Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion. Retrieved 1 February 2021 from: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/103979.
3. BALA, R.M., (2013). Limits of Gross Domestic Product in Characterizing Economic Welfare. EBEEC Conference Papers, 2013(5), Istanbul: 5th International Conference on the Economics of Balkan and Eastern Europe Countries in the Changed World, pp.133–142. Retrieved 27 January from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263652456_Limits_of_Gross_Domestic_Product_in_characterizing_economic_welfare.
4. BALTAGI, B., CHANG, Y. J., (1994). Incomplete panels: A comparative study of alternative estimators for the unbalanced one-way error component regression model. Journal of Econometrics 62(2): 67–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)90017-510.1016/0304-4076(94)90017-5
5. CLAPP, J., SEN, A., (1999). Development as Freedom. International Journal 55(1): 160–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/4020346910.2307/40203469
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献