Affiliation:
1. Czech National Bank , Czech Republic
2. Faculty of Finance and Accounting , Prague University of Economics and Business and Czech National Bank , Czech Republic
Abstract
Abstract
This article examines the procyclicality of banks’ credit losses and provisions in the Czech Republic using pre-2018 data and then discusses the implications of the findings for provisioning in stage 3 under IFRS 9. This analysis is possible because the majority of banks seem to have aligned their accounting definitions of default with the regulatory definition before the implementation of IFRS 9. Based on our results, we find significant asymmetries in the Czech banks’ behaviour over the cycle. Firstly, provisioning procyclicality is the strongest in the later contractionary phase and the early recovery phase, while it is non-existent in the early contractionary phase. Secondly, banks with higher credit risk behave more procyclically than their peers with lower credit risk. If this behaviour persists under IFRS 9 and banks do not change their provisioning behaviour from backward to forward-looking, it may lead to a delayed transfer of exposures between stages and aggravate cyclical fluctuations.
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Reference35 articles.
1. ABAD, J., SUAREZ, J. (2019). Assessing the cyclical implications of IFRS 9 – a recursive model, Occasional paper series no. 12, European Systemic Risk Board
2. AHMED, A., TAKEDA, C., THOMAS, S. (1999). Bank loan loss provisions: A reexamination of capital management, earnings management and signaling effects. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 28(1), 1–25. DOI: 10.1016/S0165-4101(99)00017-810.1016/S0165-4101(99)00017-8
3. BCBS (2015). Guidance on credit risk and accounting for expected credit losses, Basel committee on bank supervision.
4. BEATTY, A., CHAMBERLAIN, S. L., MAGLIOLO, J. (1995). Managing financial reports of commercial banks: The influence of taxes, regulatory capital, and earnings, Journal of Accounting Research, 33(2), 231–261. DOI: 10.2307/249148710.2307/2491487
5. BIKKER, J., METZEMAKERS, P. (2005). Bank provisioning behaviour and procyclicality. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 15(2), 141–157. DOI: 10.1016/j.intfin.2004.03.00410.1016/j.intfin.2004.03.004