Affiliation:
1. Akdeniz University , Faculty of Serik Business Management, Department of Economics and Finance , Antalya , Turkey
Abstract
Abstract
This paper aims to focus weekly stock market prices from the CEECs (Lithuania, Hungary, Romania, Croatia, Slovenia, Poland, Bulgaria, the Slovak Republic, Latvia, Estonia, and the Czech Republic) markets for evidence of weak-form market efficiency. This is complemented by the use of comprehensive unit root tests to test for abnormal return behaviour in these stock markets. For this purpose, Harvey et al. (2008) linearity test was applied in order to determine the characteristics of the series. The results indicate that the series with linear characteristics are Slovenia, Bulgaria, the Slovak Republic, Estonia, and the Czech Republic and those with non-linear characteristics are Lithuania, Hungary, Romania, Croatia, Poland, and Latvia. Then, in order to examine the weak-form market efficiency, DF-GLS (1996), Phillips-Perron (1988) and Lee-Strazicich (2003) unit root tests are applied to linear series and Kapetanios et al. (2003) and Kruse (2011) tests were applied to nonlinear series. The linear and nonlinear unit root tests evidence that all the selected stock markets in CEECs have a unit root, in other words, are non-stationary. In the period analyzed, the results suggest that the weak-form efficient market hypothesis holds in the CEECs. Accordingly, the results indicate support for the validity of the random walks hypothesis in all the selected stock markets in CEECs. It means that investors should not be able to earn abnormal returns by carrying out the same analysis and analysing historical prices in CEECs. The finding of weak-form market efficiency has notable implications from the point of capital allocation, stock price predictability, and the influence of shocks to stock prices.
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Reference99 articles.
1. ABRAHAM, A., FAZAL, J., SULAIMAN, A. (2002). Testing the random walk behavior and efficiency of the Gulf stock markets. The Financial Review, 37, 469-480. DOI: 10.1111/0732-8516.0000810.1111/0732-8516.00008
2. ALEXEEV, V., TAPON, F. (2011). Testing weak-form efficiency on the Toronto stock exchange. Journal of Empirical Finance, 18(4), 661-691. DOI: 10.1016/j.jempfin.2011.05.00210.1016/j.jempfin.2011.05.002
3. AL-LOUGHANI, N., CHAPPELL, D. (1997). On the validity of the weak-form efficient markets hypothesis applied to the London stock exchange. Applied Financial Economics, 7(2), 173-176. DOI: 10.1080/09603109733373610.1080/096031097333736
4. ALOM, K., RAQUIB, M. (2014). Capital market efficiency and portfolio equity inflows in Bangladesh. World Vision Research Journal, 8(1), 202-215.
5. ANANZEH, I. E. N. (2014). Testing the weak-form of efficient market hypothesis: Empirical evidence from Jordan. International Business and Management, 9(2), 119-123. DOI: 10.3968/552410.3968/5524
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献