Evaluation of the Smart Cities Listed in Smart City Index 2021 by Using Entropy Based Copras and Aras Methodology
Author:
Gelmez Emel1ORCID, Özceylan Eren2ORCID
Affiliation:
1. 1 Department of Business Administration , Selçuk University , Konya , Turkey 2. 2 Department of Industrial Engineering , Gaziantep University , Gaziantep , Turkey
Abstract
Abstract
Smart cities are included in the literature as a technology-based concept that has been on the agenda in recent years and whose framework is constantly changing with the changes in technology. There are different frameworks and indexes to define the smartness of a city. Smart City Index 2021 published by Institute for Management Development (IMD) and Singapore University of Technology and Design (SUTD) is one of the accepted studies in the world. In the report of Smart City Index 2021, 118 cities are evaluated in five criteria namely health & safety, mobility, activities, opportunities (work & school) and governance. To re-evaluate the cities and compare the results, a Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) process including Entropy based Complex Proportional Assessment (COPRAS) and Addivite Ratio Assessment (ARAS) methodology is applied in this paper. To prioritize the criteria, entropy weight method is used. 118 cities are ranked both technologically and structurally using the COPRAS and ARAS method. As a result of the analyses, according to these methods, the rankings of the smart cities are the same. Also, when technologically smart cities are listed, it is determined that the first three countries are Zhuhai, Shenzhen, Nanjing, and at the same time, Abu Dhabi, Chongqing, Hangzhou in terms of structurally.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Reference62 articles.
1. Albino, V., Berardi, U., Dangelico, R. M., Smart cities: Definitions, dimensions, performance, and initiatives, Journal of Urban Technology, 22, 1, 2015, 3-21. 2. Prasad, D., & Alizadeh, T., What makes Indian cities smart? A policy analysis of smart cities mission, Telematics and Informatics, 55, 2020, 101466. 3. Hartawan, M. S., Putra, A. S., Muktiono, A., Smart City concept for integrated citizen information smart card or ICISC in DKI Jakarta, International Journal of Science, Technology & Management, 1, 4, 2020, 364-370. 4. Su, K., Li, J., Fu, H., Smart city and the applications, 2011 International Conference on Electronics, Communications and Control (ICECC), 2011, 1028-1031. 5. Dameri, R. P., Benevolo, C., Veglianti, E., & Li, Y., Understanding smart cities as a glocal strategy: A comparison between Italy and China, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 142, 2019, 26-41.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|