Affiliation:
1. United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) , Islamabad, Pakistan. Level 2, Serena Business Complex G-5/1, Islamabad, 44000 , Pakistan .
2. Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna Institute of Demography , Vordere Zollamtsstrabe 3, 1030 Vienna , Austria .
Abstract
Abstract
In 2017, Pakistan implemented a long-awaited population census since the last one conducted in 1998. However, several experts are contesting the validity of the census data at the sub-national level, particularly in the absence of a post-enumeration survey. We propose in this article to use demographic analysis to assess the results of the 2017 census at the sub-national level, using data from the 1998 census, from all available intercensal surveys, including three rounds of Demographic and Health Survey. Applying the cohort-component method of population projection, we subject each five first-level subnational entities to estimates regarding the level of fertility, mortality, international, and internal migration derived from the analysis of the existing data. We arrive at approximately similar results as the census at the national level: an estimated 210 million (95% CI: 203.4–218.9) compared to 207.8 million counted (1.1% difference). However, we found substantial sub-national variations. While there are too many uncertainties in the data used for the reconstruction to be fully confident about them, this analysis should prompt the national and the international community to ensure that a post-enumeration survey and demographic analysis are regular features of census operations of Pakistan in particular, and in developing countries with deficient data as a whole.
Reference72 articles.
1. Ali, S.M., and M. Sultan. 2003. “Age and Sex Distribution of 1998 Census: An Evaluation.” In Population of Pakistan: An Analysis of 1998 Population and Housing Census. Edited by A. Kemal, M. Irfan and N. Mehmood, 95–119. Islamabad: Pakistan Institute of Development Economics (PIDE) and UNFPA, Islamabad.
2. Abel, G. 2013. “Estimating global migration flow tables using place of birth data.” Demographic Research, 28: 505–546. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2013.28.18.
3. Abel, G., and N. Sander. 2014. “Quantifying global international migration flows.” Science, 343: 1520–1522. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1126/science.1248676.
4. Abel, G. 2017. “Estimates of global bilateral migration flows by gender between 1960 and 2018.” International migration review, 52 (3): 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/imre.12327.
5. Abel, G. 2018. migest: Methods for the Indirect Estimation of Bilateral Migration. R package version 1.8.5. R Core Development Team. Available at: https://cran.r-project.org/package=migest (accessed December 2017).
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献