Process security methods and measurement in the context of standard management systems

Author:

Kemendi Agnes1ORCID,Michelberger Pal2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Óbuda University , Doctoral School on Safety and Security Sciences , Népszínház Street 8 H-1081 Budapest , Hungary

2. Óbuda University , Faculty of Mechanical and Safety Engineering Becsi Street 96/B H-1034 Budapest , Hungary

Abstract

Abstract The main purpose of the paper is to identify ways to establish process security in the constantly changing risk and control environment and to introduce a new model. The research is based on a literature review of process security components. Qualitative content analysis was used to establish a linkage between the certified management systems and the level of process security. Elaborations have been conducted based on the survey data of the International Standards Organisation (ISO) and served as a basis for analysis of certification types and their sectoral division in the European Union (EU) member states. A new Balanced Scorecard has been developed to cover the security pillars in the context of standard management systems and serve as a framework for process security measurement. The research paper processes the state-of-the-art issue of process security, introduces components that help to establish process security, and establishes a linkage between the level of process security and certified management systems. An analysis was based on the ISO certification information related to different management system standards. Management systems were analysed in the context of process security and corresponding process performance measures. A brief walkthrough has been prepared to demonstrate the processes behind the underlying performance measures. A new Balanced Scorecard approach has been developed that maps and covers different security aspects retrieved from and linked to different management system standards. The new Balanced Scorecard based on different security aspects of entities can be leveraged by any organisation, regardless of its size or business profile.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Reference75 articles.

1. Alolah, T., Stewart, R. A., Panuwatwanich, K., & Mohamed, S. (2014). Determining the causal relationships among balanced scorecard perspectives on school safety performance: Case of Saudi Arabia. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 68, 57-74.

2. Amer, F., Hammoud, S., Khatatbeh, H., Lohner, S., Boncz, I., & Endrei, D. (2022). The deployment of balanced scorecard in health care organisations: is it beneficial? A systematic review. BMC Health Services Research, 22(1), 1-14.

3. Anthony, R. N. (1965). Planning and control systems: a framework for analysis. Boston: Harvard Business School.

4. Arsenault, B. (2023). Your Biggest Cybersecurity Risks Could Be Inside Your Organisation. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2023/03/your-biggest-cybersecurity-risks-could-be-inside-your-organisation

5. Azour, F., Moussami, H. E., Dahbi, S., & Ezzine, L. (2017). Integration of health and safety at work and environment perspectives in the balanced scorecard. Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management Rabat Morocco, 1113-1121.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3