Affiliation:
1. 1 Faculty of Public Governance and Business Mykolas Romeris University Ateities Street 20 08303 Vilnius , Lithuania
Abstract
Abstract
The commercial performance of a construction company (CC) largely depends on the planned work programme. The annual CC work programme is a set of objects of a specific purpose and structure (a building system). The programme has the following characteristics: first, the number of objects; second, the construction technologies provided for in the projects (fully prefabricated, monolithic, brick, etc.); third, the variation of work scopes among objects; and fourth, the construction technology. These CC work programme features are interrelated, i.e., aligned with each other, forming the technological structure (TS) of the CC work programme. Once these attributes were formalised, four partial indicators were obtained: the first assesses the variation in construction objects’ sizes; the second — their number; the third — the number of applied technologies; and the fourth — the technologies. The importance of these indicators was assessed to combine them into an indicator of the technological structure of the annual CC work programme. Its quantitative assessment has scientific and practical importance, providing an opportunity to analyse its impact on the results of commercial activities, to improve the organisational management structure of the company, etc.
Reference45 articles.
1. Abad, F., Eshtehardian, E., & Taghizadeh, K. (2019). Framework for Proactive Change Management: Assessing the Risk of Change in Construction Projects Using Fuzzy Fault Tree Analysis. Journal of Architectural Engineering, 25(2), 0419010.
2. Ajayi, S. O., Oyedele, L. O., & Ilori, O. M. (2019). Changing significance of embodied energy: A comparative study of material specifications and building energy sources. Journal of Building Engineering, 23, 324-333. doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2019.02.008
3. Al-Ashmori, Y. Y., Othman, I., Rahmawati, Y., Amran, Y. H. M., Sabah, S. H. A., Rafindadi, A. D., Mikić, M. (2020). BIM benefits and its influence on the
4. BIM implementation in Malaysia. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 11(4), 1013-1019. doi: 10.1016/j.asej.2020.02.002
5. Anderson, S. (1992). Project quality and project managers. International Journal of Project Management, 10(3), 138-144. doi: 10.1016/0263-7863(92)90002-Q