Regional Aspects of the Development of Clustering in the Dairy Branch

Author:

Novikov Ivan

Abstract

In this paper, we study the classical and modern approaches to the formation of regional agro‑industrial clusters. In the current market conditions, the creation of a cluster based on the existing regional infrastructure is impractical. In most cases, clusters are called holding structures that include the full cycle of production, processing and marketing of agricultural products, for example, “dairy clusters” –there are traditional groups of companies that formally follow the classical cluster principles, but do not give individual participants in the production process sufficient organizational and legal autonomy. The conditions for the development of innovation within the cluster, as well as the mechanism for creating the scientific and innovation component of the cluster as a fully‑ledged newly created cluster element are investigated. We show that the cluster should be created on the basis and strict adherence to fundamental organizational and economic principles. In particular, while in holdings the economic result of the activity is aimed at achieving the goals of the parent company, in a cluster the maximum interest in the result and the satisfaction of the economic interests of all participants in equal measure should be laid. Moreover, the classical cluster approach in the current market conditions may be unrealizable and the author’s concept of cluster development is preferable.

Publisher

Uniwersytet Lodzki (University of Lodz)

Subject

General Medicine

Reference61 articles.

1. Albino, V., Carbonara, N., Giannoccaro, I. (2003), Coordination mechanisms based on cooperation and competition within industrial districts: An agent‑based computational approach, “Journal of Artifical Societies and Social Simulation”, SimSoc Consortium, United Kingdom, Vol. 6 (4).

2. Amin, A., Thrift, N. (1996), Globalization, Institutions, and Regional Development in Europe, “European Urban and Regional Studies”, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

3. Andersson, T., Schwaag‑Serger, S., Sorvik, J., Hansson, E.W. (2004), The Cluster Policies Whitebook, International organisation for knowledge economy and enterprise development, Malmö, Sweden.

4. Barkley, D., Henry, M. (2001), Advantages and Disadvantages of Targeting Industry Clusters (REDRL research report 09–2001–01) Regional Economic Development Laboratory, Clemson University, USA.

5. Becattini, G. (1990), The Marshallian industrial district as a socio‑economic notion, [in:] Pyke F., Becattini G., Sengenberger W. (eds.), Industrial Districts and Inter‑firm Cooperation in Italy, International Institute for Labour Studies, Geneva.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3