Affiliation:
1. Department of Law , Lahore Leads University , Pakistan
Abstract
Abstract
Comparative Legal Research (CLR) is a valuable tool for legal research because it expands the history of community experience. Understanding basic knowledge in different systems fills the knowledge gap. However, the principles of globalization and universal human rights require a greater role for systematic CLR. This article analyzes the role of comparative legal research in contemporary legal education. The discussion is based on the idea that it is useful to distinguish between the education of lawyers and the conduct of comparative legal research. Comparative law is a successful field of study that has ignited a growing interest in academic and legal education in recent decades. It is proposed to pay more attention to the comparative pedagogy of legal research in today's world, where law students must be prepared to function in a global context. While comparative academic research, the goal is to foster a deep cultural understanding of foreign law, but in legal education, the goal is to learn the spirit as an advocate. This article provides an overview of the key conceptual tools to tackle the problem of the comparative methodology by introducing the logical argument to help the researcher to filter his approach. A literature review method will adopt for this article.
Reference20 articles.
1. 1. Andrew, L., (2008). Early German Legal Anthropology: Albert Hermann Post and His Questionnaire, 52 Journal of African Law, 52, 114-126.10.1017/S0021855308000053
2. 2. Bomhoff, J., (2012). Comparing Legal Argument, in Adams, M. & Bomhoff, J (eds), Practice and Theory in Comparative Law (74-85): Cambridge University Press, UK.
3. 3. Blutman, L., (2010). In the Trap of a Legal Metaphor International Soft Law, ICLQ, 59, 605-624.10.1017/S0020589310000242
4. 4. Gutteridge, H.C., (1946). An Introduction to the Comparative Method of Legal Study & Research. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
5. 5. Hart, H.L.A., (1961). The Concept of Law (77-86): Oxford University Press, UK.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献