Using Heinrich’s (Bird’s) Pyramid of Adverse Events to Assess the Level of Safety in an Airline-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Using Heinrich’s (Bird’s) Pyramid of Adverse Events to Assess the Level of Safety in an Airline

Published:2021-12-01 Issue:4 Volume:2021 Page:11-20
ISSN:2545-2835
Container-title:Transactions on Aerospace Research
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Maklakovs Juris¹^ORCID,Bitins Aleksandrs¹^ORCID,Bogdane Ruta¹^ORCID,Shestakov Vladimir¹^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Aeronautics Institute of Riga Technical University , Lomonosov street, building 1, Riga, LV-1019 , Latvia

Abstract

Abstract One of the key concepts in matters of flight safety is that of special (abnormal) situations, with airworthiness regulation and certification of aviation equipment being based on this concept. At the same time, one is forced to admit that today there is no explicit interpretation of the standardized traits of special situations, nor are they not fully elucidated in the scientific literature. In this article we propose a pyramid-based approach to interpreting special (abnormal) in-flight situations, which allows for risk assessment not using risk matrices, but instead relying only on the probabilistic characteristics of the occurrence of events. Using the presence of a causal relationship between the layers of the pyramid, we propose an algorithm for the transition of varying degrees of danger of special situations. This algorithm can be used to develop an on-board device that informs the pilot about the dynamics of transitions from one situation to another, representing each emergency situation in a certain color.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Link

https://www.sciendo.com/pdf/10.2478/tar-2021-0020

Reference14 articles.

1. [1] Dekker, S., 2017, The Safety Anarchist: Relying on Human Expertise and Innovation, Reducing Bureaucracy and Compliance, Routledge, ISBN 978-11-38300-46-0.10.4324/9780203733455

2. [2] ICAO, 2013, Annex 19 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation: Safety Management.

3. [3] Russian Federal Aviation Administration, Department of Transportation, 2008, Aviation Regulations. Part 25. Standards of Airworthiness of Aircraft of the Transport Category, Russia. Available at https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/14/part-25.

4. [4] Helmreich R. L., Klinect J. R. and Wilhelm J.A., 1999, “Models of threat, error, and CRM in flight operations,” In Proceedings of the Tenth International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH. pp. 83-91.

5. [5] Temjashovs, A., Tereshcenko, Je., Shestakov, V., Kuleshovs, N. and Koruba, Z., 2020, “Assessment of the Degree of Danger Posed by In-flight Contingencies When Exposed to Adverse Factors Affecting the Aircraft,” Transport and Aerospace Engineering, 8(1), pp. 21-29. DOI: 10.2478/tae-2020-0003.10.2478/tae-2020-0003

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Proactive and Predictive Risk Management in Aviation Safety: a corporate strategic approach.;2023 IEEE International Workshop on Technologies for Defense and Security (TechDefense);2023-11-20