Affiliation:
1. Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agriculture , Obafemi Awolowo University , Ile Ife , Osun State , Nigeria
Abstract
Abstract
Cocoa producing households’ access to livelihood capitals would help them to adopt EU approved pesticides successfully. However, no empirical studies have addressed these issues. This study therefore investigated the effects of access to livelihood capitals on adoption of EU approved pesticides among cocoa producing households. A multi stage sampling procedure was employed to select 120 cocoa producing households for thestudy. The obtained data were analysed using descriptive statistics, multivariate probit regression and double hurdle regression model. The majority of cocoa producing households (92%) have access to natural capital, followed by physical capital (67.5%), social capital (62.5%), financial capital (58%), whereas only afew (50.8%) have access to human capital. Multivariate probit estimates showed that age (p < 0.05), gender (p < 0.05), farm size (p < 0.05), years of education (p < 0.01), farming experience (p < 0.01), household size (p < 0.01) and membership in cooperative society (p < 0.01) significantly influenced cocoa producing households’ access to livelihood capitals. The majority of cocoa producing households (81%) adopt approved pesticides. The first hurdle estimates showed that gender (p < 0.01), education (p < 0.05), membership in acooperative society (p < 0.05) and access to some livelihood capitals such as human (p < 0.01), physical (p < 0.05) and financial (p < 0.01) capitals significantly influence theprobability of adoption of EU approved pesticides. In thesecond hurdle, gender (p < 0.1), farm size (p < 0.01), household size (p < 0.01), membership in acooperative society (p < 0.01)and access to some livelihood capitals such as human (p < 0.05), physical (p < 0.01) and social (p < 0.01) capitals are significant in determining theintensity of adopting EU approved pesticides. The study concluded that access to livelihood capitals has potentials of accelerating adoption of EU approved pesticides. Other factors include gender, education, farm size and membership in acooperative society. Therefore, this study suggests that government policy on uptake of EU approved pesticides should pay more attention on cocoa producing households’ access to all these factors. Most importantly, policy package to encourage access to livelihood capitals must be strongly advocated.
Reference70 articles.
1. Abdoulaye T., Wossen T., Awotide B. (2018): Impacts of Improved Maize Varieties in Nigeria: Ex-Post Assessment of Productivity and Welfare Outcomes. Food Security 10: 369 – 379.
2. Abdullahi S. U. (2008): The Vice Chancellor’s opening remarks delivered at the National Workshop on pesticide usage, handling and safety procedures held at NAERLS conference hall, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria on 18th November.
3. Adefila J. O. (2013): Spatial effects of cocoa production on rural economy in Idanre – Ifedore area, Ondo state of Nigeria. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development 3: 56 – 66.
4. Adeogun S. O. (2008): Adoption of cocoa rehabilitation techniques among cocoa farmers in selected states of Nigeria. An unpublished PhD Thesis in the Department of Agricultural Extension and Rural Development, University of Ibadan, Ibadan Nigeria. 86 p.
5. Adepoju A. A., Oni A. O. (2012): Investigating endogeneity effects of social capital on household welfare in Nigeria: a control function approach. Quarterly Journal of International Agriculture 51: 73 – 96.
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献