Probing for Informal Work Activity

Author:

Abraham Katharine G.1,Amaya Ashley2

Affiliation:

1. University of Maryland , Joint Program in Survey Methodology and Department of Economics , College Park, Maryland, 20742 , U.S.A.

2. RTI International, Survey Research Division , 701 13 St NW, #750, Washington D.C., U.S.A.

Abstract

Abstract The Current Population Survey (CPS) is the source of official US labor force statistics. The wording of the CPS employment questions may not always cue respondents to include informal work in their responses, especially when providing proxy reports about other household members. In a survey experiment conducted using a sample of Amazon Mechanical Turk respondents, additional probing identified a substantial amount of informal work activity not captured by the CPS employment questions, both among those with no employment and among those categorized as employed based on answers to the CPS questions. Among respondents providing a proxy report for another household member, the share identifying additional work was systematically greater among those receiving a detailed probe that offered examples of types of informal work than among those receiving a simpler global probe. Similar differences between the effects of the detailed and the global probe were observed when respondents answered for themselves only among those who had already reported multiple jobs. The findings suggest that additional probing could improve estimates of employment and multiple job holding in the CPS and other household surveys, but that the nature of the probe is likely to be important.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Reference35 articles.

1. Abraham, K.G., J.C. Haltiwanger, K. Sandusky, and J.R. Spletzer. 2018. “Measuring the Gig Economy: Current Knowledge and Open Issues.” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 24950. August. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w24950.10.3386/w24950

2. Abraham, K.G. and S.N. Houseman. 2018. “Making Ends Meet: The Role of Informal Work in Supplementing Americans’ Income.” Upjohn Institute, unpublished working paper. December. Available at: https://www.aeaweb.org/conference/2019/preliminary/paper/QreAaS2h (accessed July 2019).

3. Allard, M.D. and A.E. Polivka. 2018. “Measuring Labor Market Activity Today: Are the Words Work and Job Too Limiting for Surveys?” Monthly Labor Review. November. Available at: https://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2018/article/pdf/measuring-labor-market-activity-today.htm (accessed April 2019).

4. Belli, R.F., N. Schwarz, E. Singer, and J. Talarico. 2000. “Decomposition Can Harm the Accuracy of Behavioural Frequency Reports.” Applied Cognitive Psychology 14: 295–308. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1099-0720(200007/08)14:4<295::AID-ACP646>3.0.CO;2-1.10.1002/1099-0720(200007/08)14:4<295::AID-ACP646>3.0.CO;2-1

5. Blair, E. and S. Burton. 1987. “Cognitive Processes Used by Survey Respondents to Answer Behavioral Frequency Questions.” Journal of Consumer Research 14(2): 280–288. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/209112.10.1086/209112

Cited by 11 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3