Surveying Persons in Same-Sex Relationships in a Probabilistic Way – An Example from the Netherlands

Author:

Steinmetz Stephanie1,Fischer Mirjam2

Affiliation:

1. University of Lausanne , Institute for Social Sciences , Quartier UNIL-Mouline, Batiment Géopolis, 1015 Lausanne , Switzerland .

2. German Institute for Economic Research (DIW Berlin), Survey Methodology and Survey Management (SOEP Survey) , Möhrenstraße 58, 10117 Berlin , Germany .

Abstract

Abstract In the last decade, the call for improved estimates of lesbians, gay men and bisexual (LGB) populations has grown steadily. This is related to the increasing visibility of same-sex unions and the rapidly evolving changes in the legal and normative institutional frameworks regarding same-sex relationships in Western countries. The aim of this article is to present the sampling strategy and discuss the quality of a recently conducted probability-based survey in the Netherlands that targeted mixed-sex and same-sex couples with and without children. The core questions addressed are (1) whether the sampling strategy paid off in terms of identifying same-sex households and (2) whether the collected sample is representative of the target population. While the sampling strategy has success in identifying same-sex households, the question of representativeness remains a challenging task in surveying LGB populations and couples in particular. Especially, aspects related to the sampling strategy, the survey mode and the covered topic of the research are central to understanding observed selection patterns in the examined mixed- and same-sex samples.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Reference66 articles.

1. Almazan, E. et al. 2009. “Best Practices for Asking Questions about Sexual Orientation on Surveys?” Los Angeles: The Williams Institute. Available at: https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/SMART-FINAL-Nov-2009.pdf (accessed September 2019).

2. Andersson, G., T. Noak, A. Seierstad, and H. Weedon-Fekjaer. 2006. “The demographics of same-sex marriages in Norway and Sweden.” Demography 43: 79–98. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1353/dem.2006.0001.10.1353/dem.2006.0001

3. Banens, M. and E. Le Penven. 2016. “Sex miscoding in the census and its effects on the enumeration of same-sex couples.” Population 71(1): 131–143. DOI: http://doi.org/10.3917/popu.1601.0135.10.3917/popu.1601.0135

4. Barrett, H. and F. Tasker. 2001. “Growing up with a gay parent: Views of 101 gay fathers on their sons’ and daughters’ experiences.” Educational and Child Psychology 18: 62–77.

5. Bell, A. and M. Weinberg. 1978. “Homosexuality’s: a study of diversity among men and women.” New York: Simon and Shuster.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3