Failure and opportunities of public value capture and developer obligations in Polish urban development

Author:

Gielen Demetrio Muñoz1ORCID,Ossowicz Tomasz2ORCID,Zaborowski Tomasz Piotr3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Radboud Universiteit , Amsterdam , Netherlands

2. Faculty of Architecture , Wrocław University of Science and Technology , Wroclaw , Poland

3. Faculty of Geograohy and Regional Studies , University of Warsaw , Warsaw , Poland

Abstract

Abstract As many countries pursue private financing for urban public infrastructure, the tools for public value capture (PVC) gain prominence. This paper analyses Polish PVC tools in general, and spotlights a specific type: developer obligations (DOs). The authors conclude that the tools are ineffective for a series of reasons: negligence in the elaboration of pragmatic rationales (to mitigate the negative impacts of urban development), a lack of feasible (affordable) coercive land policy tools, and legislation (which puts Poland in sharp contrast to other countries) that prohibits municipalities from requiring DOs in exchange for approval of a land-use plan or planning permit, as well as the general ban on securing such obligations in a planning agreement (except for specific situations introduced by recent laws that have not yet been applied). As a consequence, new urban development in Poland neither includes sufficient urban public infrastructure, nor does it provide for social/affordable housing.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)

Reference65 articles.

1. Alterman, R 2009, ‘Can the “unearned increment” in land values be harnessed to supply affordable housing?’, in Proceedings of Conference Financing affordable housing and infrastructure in cities: towards innovative land and property taxation system, UN Habitat GLTN, Warsaw.

2. Alterman, R 2012, ‘Land-Use Regulations and Property Values. The “Windfalls Capture” Idea Revisited’ in The Oxford Handbook on Urban Economics and Planning, eds N Brooks, K Donangy & GJ Knapp, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 755–786.

3. Bailey, SJ 1990, ‘Charges for local infrastructure’, The Town Planning Review, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 427–453.

4. Bowers, J 1992, ‘The Economics of Planning Gain: a reappraisal’, Urban Studies, vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 1329–1339.

5. Bromley, DW 2000, ‘Regulatory takings and land use conflicts’ in Property Rights, Economics, and the Environment, ed M D Kaplowitz, JAI Press, Stamford, pp. 23–33.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3