The Efficacy of Fungicides Against Cercospora beticola in Field Conditions
Author:
Hudec Kamil1, Mihók Milan2, Roháčik Tibor1
Affiliation:
1. 1 Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra , Slovak Republic 2. Blumeria consulting s.r.o ., Nitra , Slovak Republic
Abstract
Abstract
This study is focused on the evaluation of the efficacy of conventional fungicides against Cercospora leaf spot (CLS) on sugar beet. The results showed that the best protection against CLS was achieved by treatment with kresoxim-methyl + epoxiconazole (T1) and tetraconazole (T2). The second highest fungicide efficacy was detected after treatment with (kresoxim-methyl + epoxiconazole -T1) + difenoconazole -T2, followed by (azoxystrobin + cyproconazole) + difenoconazole, (prochloraz + propiconazole) + tetraconazole, Urtica dioica plant extracts + Salix spp. plant extracts, (trifloxystrobin + cyproconazole) + tetraconazole, and picoxystrobin + tetraconazole. The positive effect of fungicide protection on yield and sugar content was higher in the year with a higher occurrence of CLS. Good CLS management could increase the root yield by up to 19.34%, and sugar yield by up to 23.83% in comparison to the untreated check. The highest sugar yield was achieved in the treatment by (prochloraz + propiconazole) + tetraconazole, followed by (kresoxim-methyl + epoxiconazole) + difenoconazole, (azoxystrobin + cyproconazole) + difenoconazole, (trifloxystrobin + cyproconazole) + tetraconazole, picoxystrobin + tetraconazole, and Urtica dioica plant extracts + Salix spp. plant extracts. The results showed a strong relationship of root yield and sugar yield on fungicide treatment during the vegetation. The occurrence of fungicide resistance in Cercospora beticola population has an important impact on efficacy of applied fungicides in field conditions. The highest economic effectiveness coefficient was achieved at treatment by (prochloraz + propiconazole) + tetraconazole.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Reference22 articles.
1. Anesiadis, T., Karaoglanidis, G. S. and Tzavella-Klonari, K. (2003). Protective, curative and eradicant activity of the strobilurin fungicide azoxystrobin against Cercospora beticola and Erysiphe betae. Journal of Phytopathology, 151(11 ‒ 12), 647 ‒ 651. DOI:10.1046/j.1439-0434.2003.00780.x. 2. Balandžić, M., Stojšin, V., Grahovac, M., Bagi, F., Petreš, M., Loc, M., Dudaš, T., Vukotić, J., Stankov, A., and Budakov, D. (2020). Sensitivity of Cercospora beticola isolates to azoxystrobin. Contemporary Agriculture, 69(1 ‒ 2), 1 ‒ 4. DOI:10.2478/contagri-2020-0001. 3. Bolton, M. D., Birla, K., Rivera-Varas, K., Rudolph, K. D., and Secor, G.A. (2012). Characterization of CbCyp51 from field isolates of Cercospora beticola. Phytopathology, 102(3), 298 ‒ 305. DOI:10.1094/PHYTO-07-11-0212. 4. El Housni, Z., Tahiri, A., Ezrari, S., Radouane, N., and Ouijja, A. (2023). Occurrence of Cercospora beticola Sacc populations resistant to benzimidazole, demethylation-inhibiting, and quinone outside inhibitors fungicides in Morocco. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 165(1), 73 ‒ 83. DOI:10.1007/s10658-022-02589-5. 5. Fan, K., Wang, J., Fu, L., Li, X., Zhang, Y., Zhang, X., Zhai, H., and Qu, J. (2016). Sensitivity of Botryosphaeria dothidea from apple to tebuconazole in China. Crop Protection, 87(1 ‒ 5), 1 ‒ 5. DOI:10.1016/j.cropro.2016.04.018.
|
|