Affiliation:
1. University of Kragujevac , Faculty of Economics , Kragujevac , Serbia
2. IRDO Institute for the Development of Social Responsibility , Maribor , Slovenia
3. University of Maribor, Faculty of Economics and Business , Maribor , Slovenia
Abstract
Abstract
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) becomes one of the prerequisites for success of contemporary organizations aimed at humankind’s survival by sustainable development. As SR behavior can generate significant benefits, more and more organizations are developing SR strategic plans and implementing SR initiatives. In ISO 26000, CSR has three basic concepts: Responsibility for one’s influences over society, interdependence and holistic approach. Therefore, authors focus on systemic approach to CSR. The purpose is to demonstrate how combined use of appropriate systems theories can help dealing with CSR. Accordingly, Dialectical Systems Theory (DST) and System Dynamics (SD), as relevant systems theories, i.e. methodologies stemming from different systemic paradigms, were selected. DST helped to identify some relevant aspects and components of CSR which were empirically tested in businesses in the Republic of Serbia. Hence, the following factors, i.e. groups of SR activities are selected as relevant for improving organizational performance: General CSR activities; CSR activities towards consumers; CSR activities towards environmental protection and beneficiaries’ health, and Socially responsible after sales activities. In addition, empirical research results indicating the influence of the above factors on performance were the basis for using the tools of SD, such as stock and flow diagrams and causal loop diagrams. SD tools contribute to simulating the system’s future behavior, i.e. future performance level after improving these CSR activities. Authors introduce a new, systemic approach to conceptualizing and researching CSR by providing appropriate methodological support for exploring relevant interdependencies of CSR aspects.
Subject
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,General Agricultural and Biological Sciences,General Business, Management and Accounting,Materials Science (miscellaneous),Business and International Management
Reference32 articles.
1. Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2004). Doing Better at Doing Good: When, Why, and How Consumers Respond to Corporate Social Initiatives. California Management Review, 47(1), 9–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/4116628410.2307/41166284
2. Chen, J., Liu, J. & Qin, J. (2019). Corporate social responsibility and capacity selection. Transformations in Business & Economics, 18, 3C(48C), 530–545.
3. Crifo, P., Diaye, M., & Pekovis, S. (2016). CSR related management practices and firm performance: An empirical analysis of the quantity–quality trade-of on French data. International Journal of Production Economics, 171(3), 405–441. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.12.01910.1016/j.ijpe.2014.12.019
4. De Bakker, F.G.A., Groenewegen, P., & Den Hond, F. (2005), A bibliometric analysis of 30 years of research and theory on corporate social Responsibility and corporate social performance. Business and Society, 44(3), 283–317. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/000765030527808610.1177/0007650305278086
5. European Commission (2011). A renewed EU strategy 2011–14 for Corporate Social Responsibility. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/sustainable-business/corporate-social-responsibility/index_en.htm
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献