Affiliation:
1. SBB , Blood Bank Technical Specialist-Central, Immucor, Inc. , 32062 DiStefano Court , Fraser , MI , United States
Abstract
Abstract
Screening for clinically significant antibodies is crucial in transfusion medicine and is a routine part of pre-transfusion testing. The indirect antiglobulin test (IAT) is the most reliable and effective test for detecting clinically significant alloantibodies reacting at the antihuman globulin phase. Two of the main methods used for antibody detection and identification are solid-phase red cell adherence (SPRCA) and microcolumn agglutination technology (CAT), with or without enzyme-treated red blood cells (RBCs). This study was undertaken to detect and identify alloantibodies by performing antibody screen (ABS) and antibody identification (ABID) testing using SPRCA and CAT, with and without ficin-treated RBCs. Residual patient samples collected between 1 December 2020 and 19 May 2021 were saved, de-identified, and frozen at ≤−30°C before testing for alloantibodies. Seventy antibodies were detected in 53 samples among the 203 samples that underwent an ABS. Of those samples, 150 (73.0%) were nonreactive, 47 (23.1%) yielded positive results with both CAT and SPRCA, and six (3.0%) yielded positive ABS results with SPRCA only. Fifty-three samples that underwent ABID by both methods yielded eight samples with antibodies identified by SPRCA only. Additional enhancement of the CAT method by the use of ficin-treated RBCs was required to detect seven of the eight SPRCA-only antibodies; one sample remained nonreactive regardless. SPRCA testing detected clinically significant antibodies without the addition of enzyme-treated RBCs that was necessary in the CAT testing.
Reference12 articles.
1. Combs MR, Bredehoeft SJ. Selecting an acceptable and safe antibody detection test can present a dilemma. Immuno-hematology 2001;17:86–9.
2. Hill BC, Hanna CA, Adamski J, Pham HP, Marques MB, Williams LA 3rd. Ficin-treated red cells help identify clinically significant alloantibodies masked as reactions of undetermined specificity in gel microtubes. Lab Med 2017;48:24–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/labmed/lmw062
3. Zeiler T, Thiele S, Kretschmer V. Solid phase technique versus gel centrifugation for detection of erythrocyte antibodies: a prospective study comparison the 2 antibody detection tests. Beitrage zur Infusionstherapie und Transfusionsmedizin 1996;33:17–21.
4. Shin JW. Unexpected red cell antibody detection by conditional combination of LISS/Coombs and NaCl/enzyme gel tests at a tertiary hospital in Korea: a 5-year study. Blood Res 2013;48:217–21. https://doi:10.5045/br.2013.48.3.217
5. Enko D, Habres C, Wallner F, Mayr B, Halwachs-Baumann G. Frequencies and specificities of ‘‘enzyme-only’’ detected erythrocyte alloantibodies in patients hospitalized in Austria: is an enzyme test required for routine red blood cell antibody screening? J Blood Transfus 2014;532919. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/532919