The Accuracy Assessment of Devices Used for Distance Measuring in Dynamic Vehicle Tests

Author:

Kuchar Peter1,Janoško Ivan1,Holúbek Michal2,Čedík Jakub2,Pexa Martin2

Affiliation:

1. Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra , Slovakia

2. Czech University of Life Sciences Prague , Czech Republic

Abstract

Abstract The paper presented deals with the accuracy of three selected devices based on acceleration measurement: accelerometer – XL meter, the global position measurement device by VBox and the constructed 5th wheel, which allows a very accurate measurement of distance along with speed and acceleration of the vehicle. The accuracy of recordings was tested during various driving conditions when all the three measuring devices were attached to the vehicle. Measurements showed that GPS-based measuring devices level off and even surpass accelerometers when used in locations with a good view of the sky. The 5th wheel provided the most representative results, as the difference between average and real standard deviations of the measured distance were 0.78%, 1.38%, 3.48% for the 5th wheel, VBox GPS and XL meter, respectively. The accuracy of the 5th wheel and VBox can be considered very high when taking into account the fact that dynamic actions were monitored. The paper purpose is to point out the significance of measuring device selection in assessing the distance travelled by the vehicle.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Mechanical Engineering,Waste Management and Disposal,Agronomy and Crop Science

Reference24 articles.

1. BAENA, A. – REMOLINA, E. E. – ENCISO, G. – LONDOÑO, H. – TORESAN, W. 2019. Comparative analysis of methods to estimate the tire/road friction coefficient applied to traffic accident reconstruction. In SAE Technical Papers, article no. 2020-01-5058.

2. BURG, H. – MOSER, A. 2014. Handbook of Accident Reconstruction: Accident Investigation, Vehicle Dynamics, Simulation. 1st ed., Washington : CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform, 506 pp. ISBN 9781492328421.

3. CHEN, Y. L. – SHEN, K. Y. – WANG, S. C. 2013. Forward collision warning system considering both time-to-collision and safety braking distance. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE 8th Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications, pp. 972–977.

4. CIEPKA, P. – JANCZUR, R. 2019. Application of VBox sport and VBox 3i devices in the inspection of post-accident vehicles. In Z Zagadnien Nauk Sadowych, vol. 117, pp. 63–71.

5. GARDULSKI, J. 2011. The fifth wheel is a part of a data acquisition system for diagnostic testing of car shock absorbers with vibroacoustic methods. In Biuletyn WAT, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 83–91.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Dynamic and Stationary Testing of Vehicle Braking Systems;Acta Technologica Agriculturae;2023-11-14

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3