Assessment of the European Commission's proposals for financing the EU budget in 2021–20271

Author:

Kawecka-Wyrzykowska Elżbieta1

Affiliation:

1. Collegium of World Economy, SGH Warsaw School of Economics , Warsaw , Poland

Abstract

Abstract A major problem in all European Union (EU) budgetary negotiations is the approach of Member States in net return terms (the fair-return approach). EU members compare their contributions to the EU budget with transfers that they receive from the budget. Net payers tend to reduce the size of the budget to contribute less. Brexit has aggravated the problem of the size of revenue (due to the United Kingdom's position as a big net payer). Also, new expenditure needs have arisen (for protecting external borders and climate, innovation, etc.). To address those needs, in 2018, the Commission submitted three proposals to supplement the current resources to finance the EU budget after the expiry of the principles of the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) for 2014–2020 at the end of 2020. The article aims to indicate whether the Commission's proposals are good instruments for the financing of the EU budget. The assessment relies on selected criteria based on theory. It also takes account of the feasibility of the proposals. The main conclusion is that none of the proposals meets well theoretical criteria of “genuine” EU revenue. Also, for practical reasons, it will be difficult for the Member States to come to an agreement on new budgetary resources. All proposals would be relatively costly for Poland.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Reference34 articles.

1. Becker, P. (2019), A new budget for the EU. Negotiations on the Multiannual Financial Framework 2021–2027, SWP Research Paper, No. 11, pp. 1–38, doi: 10.18449/2019RP11.

2. Begg, I. (2009), Fiscal federalism, subsidiarity and the EU budget review, Swedish Institute for European Policy Studies, Stockholm, pp. 1–60.

3. Cattoir, P. (2004), Tax-based EU own resources: an assessment. European Commission Directorate-General Taxation and Customs Union Working Paper, No. 1, pp. 1–45.

4. Cieślukowski, M. (2005), A rational system of the own resources for the European Community, Economics and Business Review, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 5–24.

5. Cipriani, G. (2016), Reforming the EU's budget revenue: the case for a visible VAT-based resource, CEPS Special Report, No. 150, pp. 1–24.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3