Efficiency and equity – The Swedish economy in comparison to other countries at the beginning of the 21st century

Author:

Czarny Bogusław1,Czarny Elżbieta2

Affiliation:

1. Collegium of World Economy, SGH Warsaw School of Economics , Warsaw , Poland , E-Mail: bczarny@sgh.waw.pl

2. Collegium of World Economy, SGH Warsaw School of Economics , Warsaw , Poland .

Abstract

Abstract Referring to economic ideals of efficiency and equity, we are comparing the state of the Swedish economy in the early 21st century to the situation in other countries, especially the other Nordic countries, the United States (US), and Poland. After presenting the basic facts about Nordic countries we examine the issue of economic efficiency. In addition to gross domestic product (GDP) we use the Human Development Index (HDI), the findings of the economics of happiness, and the number of registered triadic patent families as measures of efficiency. Then we analyze the issue of equity. We use the Gini coefficient, the extent of poverty, the level of unemployment, and the level of intergenerational mobility of earnings as measures of equity. The analysis reveals that inhabitants of Sweden and the other Nordic countries have been achieving some of the best economic results in the world. This applies to the level of GDP per capita in these countries, to the capability of inhabitants to utilize their full potential, and to their life satisfaction. These countries’ ability to create innovation is impressive. At the same time, Nordics have successfully reduced the scale of social inequalities and ensured relatively equal opportunities for all citizens. This is evidenced by low income inequality, low unemployment, and low poverty rate in these countries. Sweden and the other Nordic countries are superior to the US both in terms of efficiency and equity. Poland, on the other hand, lags far behind Nordics, as well as the US, in terms of efficiency, as exemplified by the relatively low GDP per capita and very low innovation in Poland. In terms of equity, however, Poland loses to Nordics but seems to win to the US.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Reference23 articles.

1. Central Intelligence Agency (2018), The World Factbook, retrieved from https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/ [ 1st November 2019].

2. Corak, M. (2016), Inequality from generation to generation: the United States in comparison, Discussion Paper, No. 9929, Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit (IZA), Bonn.

3. Corak, M. (2013a), Inequality from generation to generation: the United States in comparison, in: R. Rycroft (Ed.), The economics of inequality, poverty, and discrimination in the 21st century, ABC–CLIO, Santa Barbara, CA, pp. 107–126.

4. Corak, M. (2013b), Income inequality, equality of opportunity, and intergenerational mobility, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 79–102.

5. Corak, M. (2006), Do poor children become poor adults? Lessons from a cross country comparison of generational earnings mobility, Discussion Paper No. 1993, Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit (IZA), Bonn.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3