Total Errors of TSH results by fluorescent immunoassay technique from dried blood spots in a newborn screening program for congenital hypothyroidism - variations in time

Author:

Oprea Oana Roxana12,Zaharia Mihaela1,Dobreanu Minodora12

Affiliation:

1. George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science, and Technology of Targu Mures , Romania

2. Emergency Clinical County Hospital Targu Mures , Romania

Abstract

Abstract Objective:the aim of this study was to evaluate the imprecision of the method used to determine TSH (Thyroid Stimulating Hormone) levels from dried blood spots in a newborn screening program and how the value of the coefficient of variation influences the total error of the method. Methods:A short-term evaluation of imprecision was compared with the imprecision of the method assessed over five years. The coefficient of variation from the best quality control period and the worst quality control period were used. For Bias assessment mean results from the external quality program were used. Total Error was calculated with Bias and Coefficient of Variation values. A freely available software was used for standard deviation and coefficient of variation profiling. Results:The values of the coefficient of variation for the short-term were lower than values obtained in worst quality control period but higher than in the best quality control period. Total error was higher than the accepted value for low-level control in the worst quality control period. Images obtained with the software showed that for high-level control coefficient of variation is concentration-dependent but this finding is not similar for low-level control. Conclusions:Total Error of the Method may be subject to change in time. Initial evaluation of imprecision must be performed on a short term analysis but a continuous evaluation should be performed as the performance of a method may change in time. The evaluation should be performed on clinically significant levels for each parameter.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Reference9 articles.

1. 1. Westgard JO, Westgard SA. Selecting the right SQC procedurein Westgard JO, Basic QC Practices 4th ed. Westgard QC Inc. Madison,WI, 135-152.

2. 2. User verification of Precision and Estimation of Bias; Approved Guideline - Third Edition. CLSI document EP 15-A3. Wayne,PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Instutitute; 2014.

3. 3. Sadler WA. Imprecision Profiling. Clin Biochem Rev. 2008;29:33-36.

4. 4. Westgard JO. Quality Design and Control applications in Westgard JO. Six Sigma Design and Control 2nd ed. Westgard QC Inc. Madison,WI, 157-197.

5. 5. VFP Variance Function Program, http://www.aacb.asn.au/resources/useful-tools/variance-function-program-v14.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3