What do modern languages with <i>Scriptio Continua</i> have in common?-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

What do modern languages with Scriptio Continua have in common?

Published:2021-12-01 Issue:3 Volume:72 Page:821-838
ISSN:1338-4287
Container-title:Journal of Linguistics/Jazykovedný casopis
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Butskhrikidze Marika¹

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of English Language, AAB College , Prishtinë , Kosovo

Abstract

Abstract Theoretically, it is possible for any language to practice scriptio continua (a style of writing without spaces or any markers between the words/sentences) due to the very nature of language: a system of arbitrary and discrete elements. Two universal functions of sound: distinctive and delimitative, ensure that any language has boundary markers for meaning-bearing units that facilitate both language production and comprehension. We argue that some languages are more adaptive to this writing style than others. The languages that have predominantly isolating/analytic or agglutinative constructions with tones and limited combinatory rules (restricted phonotactic constraints) are more suitable to have scriptio continua than inflectional languages with complex phonotactic rules and free stress. This correlation is examined in three modern languages that to this day practice scriptio continua: Burmese, Thai, and Lhasa Tibetan.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics,Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics

Link

https://www.sciendo.com/pdf/10.2478/jazcas-2022-0006

Reference41 articles.

1. ABRAMSON, Arthur: The Vowels and Tones of Standard Thai. Acoustical Measurements and Experiments. In: International Journal of American Linguistics. Part III, Vol. 28, No 2. Bloomington: Indiana University 1962. 146 p.

2. BRADLEY, David: Burmese as a lingua franca. In: Atlas of Languages of Intercultural Communication in the Pacific, Asia, and the Americas, Vol. 1. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter 1996, pp. 745–747.10.1515/9783110819724.2.745

3. BUTSKHRIKIDZE, Marika: Implicational universals on relationship between the word stress and devoicing of final obstruents (in fixed stress languages). In: Bulletin of Georgia Academy of the Sciences, 1994a, Vol. 149, pp. 334–336.

4. BUTSKHRIKIDZE, Marika: Primacy of final voiceless consonants in Turkic languages. In: Bulletin of the Georgia Academy of Sciences, 1994b, Vol. 150, pp. 554–558.

5. BUTSKHRIKIDZE, Marika: Morphological factors determining fixed accent placement. In: Bulletin of the Georgia Academy of Sciences, 1996a, Vol. 153, pp. 312–315.