The Impact of Electoral Gender Quotas on Women’s Political Participation in Bosnia and Herzegovina

Author:

Merdanović Ajla Van Heel,Delalić Selma

Abstract

Abstract Although representing half of the world population, women remain largely excluded from political power and government structures. Various strategies have been introduced to increase women’s political representation, including electoral gender quotas. This paper explores the impact of electoral gender quotas on women’s quantitative participation in politics of Bosnia and Herzegovina, analysing quota impact in combination with other related factors, such as the quota design, implementation and broader political context. A diversity of techniques has been used to collect a combination of quantitative and qualitative data, including academic resources collection and analysis, desk research, statistical data analysis and online questionnaire. The paper argues that electoral gender quotas have generally had a positive impact on getting women elected in BiH, though their efficacy depends on their formulation and other aspects of electoral law. Still, quantitative representation of women is not sufficient to facilitate their agency in politics. Social attitudes also continue to affect the electoral success of women once they secure a spot on the candidate list. Therefore, quotas must be implemented within a broader democratic, accountable and gender-sensitive political context to deliver qualitative representation of women in politics. Finally, the paper offers concrete recommendations to promote women’s political participation in BiH.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science

Reference33 articles.

1. Aganović, A. – Miftari, E. – Veličković, M. (2015): Women and political life in Post-Dayton Bosnia and Herzegovina: 1995–2015. (S. Gavrić & M. Zagorac, Eds.). Sarajevo Open Centre.

2. Baltrunaite, A. et al. (2014): Gender Quotas and the Quality of Politicians. Journal of Public Economics, 118, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0047272714001480

3. Bari, F. (2005): Women’s Political Participation: Issues and Challenges, https://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/egm/enabling-environment2005/docs/EGM-WPD-EE-2005-EP.12%20%20draft%20F.pdf

4. Besley, T. et al. (2017): Gender Quotas and the Crisis of the Mediocre Man: Theory and Evidence from Sweden. American Economic Review. https://diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1153759/FULLTEXT01.pdf.

5. Bittner, J. (2019): Germany Wants More Women in Politics. But Quotas Are a Bad Idea. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/01/opinion/germany-wants-more-women-in-politics-but-quotas-are-a-bad-idea.html

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3