Affiliation:
1. Palacký University Olomouc , Department of General Linguistics .
Abstract
Abstract
The article responds to the current variability of research into linguistic laws and the explanation of these laws. We show basic features to approach linguistic laws in the field of quantitative linguistics and research on linguistic laws outside the field of language and text. Language laws are usually explained in terms of the language system—especially as economizing—or of the information structure of the text (Piantadosi 2014). One of the hallmarks of the transmission of linguistic laws outside the realm of language and text is that they provide other kinds of explanations (Torre et al. 2019). We want to show that the problem of linguistics in the explanation of linguistic laws lies primarily in its inability to clarify the internal structure of language material, and the influence of the theory or method used for sample processing on the result of law analysis—which was formulated by Peter Grzybek (2006). We would like to show that this is the reason why linguistics avoids explanations of linguistic laws.
Reference28 articles.
1. Altmann, G., 1978. Towards a theory of language. Glottometrika 1, 1–25.
2. Altmann, G., Wimmer, G. (2005): The Unified Derivation of some Linguistic Laws. In: Köhler, R. et al. Quantitative Linguistics, 791–807.
3. Altmann, G., 1980. Prolegomena to Menzerath’s Law. Glottometrika, 2, 1–10.
4. Andres, J., 2009. On de Saussure’s principle of linearity and visualization of language structures. Glotto-theory, 2(2), 1–14.10.1515/glot-2009-0015
5. Andres, J., Benešová, M., Kubáček, L., Vrbková, J., 2012a. Methodological Note on the Fractal Analysis of Texts. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 19(1), 1–31.10.1080/09296174.2011.608604