Challenges in virtual team communication in the context of virtual exchange experience
-
Published:2023-03-01
Issue:1
Volume:25
Page:49-61
-
ISSN:1027-5207
-
Container-title:European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:
Author:
Ala-Kortesmaa Sanna1ORCID, Muñoz Candice2
Affiliation:
1. 1 Tampere University , Tampere , FINLAND 2. 2 Mott Community College , Flint , USA
Abstract
Abstract
As technology has enabled people across the world to collaborate and create virtual communities, the ability to interact in computer-mediated, cross-cultural environments in a meaningful way has become a necessity. This is particularly true for younger adults who operate in virtual teams during their studies, for instance in virtual exchange projects, and later in their professional life. In this qualitative study, we examined the features and functionality of cross-cultural communication in virtual exchange teams. By analysing three datasets produced by Finnish university and American community college students (n=38) who participated in a virtual exchange, we examined what kinds of challenges emerge in the communication of virtual teams and how students use theories of computer-mediated communication when trying to make sense of those challenges. The results of the reflexive thematic analysis indicated that the challenges in communication of virtual teams stem from cultural and motivational differences. These challenges could be alleviated by increasing the shared work time allocated for social information sharing and for constructing appropriate, team-specific ways to express online social presence and propinquity. The findings highlight the meaningfulness and relationality of virtual team communication and provide insight into motivational factors and the sense of belonging when communication challenges arise.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Reference33 articles.
1. Batarseh, F., Usher, J., & Daspit, J. (2017). Collaboration capability in virtual teams: Examining the influence on diversity and innovation. International Journal of Innovation Management, 21(04), 1750034. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919617500347 2. Campbell, K. A., Orr, E., Durepos, P., Nguyen, L., Li, L., Whitmore, C., Gehrke, P., Graham, L., & Jack, S. M. (2021). Reflexive thematic analysis for applied qualitative health research. The Qualitative Report, 26(6), 2011–2028. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2021.5010 3. Cundill, G., Harvey, B., Tebboth, M., Cochrane, L., Currie-Alder, B., Vincent, K., Lawn, J., Nicholls, RJ., Scodanibbio, L., Prakash, A., New, M., Wester, P., Leone, M., Morchain, D., Ludi, E., DeMaria-Kinney, J., Khan, A., & Landry, M. E. (2019). Large-scale transdisciplinary collaboration for adaptation research: Challenges and insights. Global Challenges, 3(4), 1700132. https://doi.org/10.1002/gch2.201700132 4. Custer, L., & Tuominen, A. (2017). Bringing “internationalization at home” opportunities to community colleges: Design and assessment of an online exchange activity between U.S. and Japanese students. Teaching Sociology, 45(4), 347–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055×16679488 5. Dervin, B. (2015). Dervin’s sense-making theory. In M. Al-Suqri, & A. Al-Aufi (Eds.), Information seeking behavior and technology adaptation: Theories and trends, (pp. 59–80). IGI Global.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|