Argumentation-Based Logic for Ethical Decision Making

Author:

Almpani Sofia1ORCID,Stefaneas Petros2ORCID,Frangos Panayiotis1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. National Technical University of Athens , 9, Iroon Polytechniou Str., 157 73 Zografou , Athens , Greece

2. National Technical University of Athens 9 , Iroon Polytechniou Str., 157 73 Zografou , Athens , Greece

Abstract

Abstract As automation in artificial intelligence is increasing, we will need to automate a growing amount of ethical decision making. However, ethical decision- making raises novel challenges for engineers, ethicists and policymakers, who will have to explore new ways to realize this task. The presented work focuses on the development and formalization of models that aim at ensuring a correct ethical behaviour of artificial intelligent agents, in a provable way, extending and implementing a logic-based proving calculus that is based on argumentation reasoning with support and attack arguments. This leads to a formal theoretical framework of ethical competence that could be implemented in artificial intelligent systems in order to best formalize certain parameters of ethical decision-making to ensure safety and justified trust.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Reference28 articles.

1. 1. Ågotnes T. and Wooldridge, M. Optimal social laws. in Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, AAMAS, 1, 2010, pp. 667–674.

2. 2. Almpani, S. and Stefaneas, P. On proving and argumentation. AIC 2017, 5th International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Cognition, Larnaka, 2017.

3. 3. Almpani, S. and Stefaneas, P. and Vandoulakis, I. On the Role of argumentation in discovery proof-events. C3GI 2017, 6th International Workshop on Computational Creativity, Concept Invention, and General Intelligence, Madrid, 2017.

4. 4. Arkin, R. Governing Lethal Behavior in Autonomous Robots. CRC Press, 2009.10.1201/9781420085952

5. 5. Blass, J. and Forbus, K. Moral Decision-Making by Analogy: Generalizations vs. Exemplars. AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence; Twenty-Ninth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Austin, Jan. 2015.10.1609/aaai.v29i1.9226

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Human-Robot Dialogue that Elicits The Alignment of Moral Principles For Driverless Vehicles;Companion of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction;2024-03-11

2. Formalization of Ethical Decision Making;International Journal of Extreme Automation and Connectivity in Healthcare;2023-03-24

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3