Trends in Argumentation Logic-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Trends in Argumentation Logic

Published:2022-12-01 Issue:3-4 Volume:11 Page:1-5
ISSN:2299-0518
Container-title:Studia Humana
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Almpani Sofia¹,Lisanyuk Elena²^ORCID,Schumann Andrew³^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. National Technical University of Athens , 9 Iroon Polytexneiou str. 15780 Zografou , Attiki , Greece

2. St Petersburg State University , 7-9, Universitetskaya nab., St Petersburg 199034 , Russian Federation ; National Research University Higher School of Economics 21/4 Staraya Basmannaya St ., Moscow , Russian Federation

3. University of Information Technology and Management in Rzeszow , Sucharskiego 2 Street, 35-225 Rzeszow , Poland

Abstract

Abstract In this paper, we introduce the subject of the special issue Trends in Argumentation Logic. Here we mainly describe two approaches to argumentation logic with explicating monotonic and non-monotonic, or defeasible, reasoning and explain the role of artificial intelligence in applying argumentation logic. Then we give a short overview of the papers contributed to the special issue.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Link

https://www.sciendo.com/pdf/10.2478/sh-2022-0010

Reference13 articles.

1. 1. Alchourrón, C., P. Gärdenfors, D. Makinson, On the logic of theory change: Partial meet contraction and revision functions, Journal of Symbolic Logic 50, 1985, pp. 510-530.10.2307/2274239

2. 2. Almpani, S., Y. Kiouvrekis, P. Stefaneas, P. Frangos, Computational Argumentation for Medical Device Regulatory Classification, International Journal on Artificial Intelligence Tools 31, 2022, DOI: 10.1142/S021821302250005110.1142/S0218213022500051

3. 3. Barbashina, E., E. Lisanyuk, Leon Petrażycki on Norms and Their Logical Study, Studia Humana 7: 4, 2018, pp. 30-38.10.2478/sh-2018-0021

4. 4. Dung, P.M., On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming, and n-person games, Artificial Intelligence 77, 1995, pp. 321-357.10.1016/0004-3702(94)00041-X

5. 5. Eemeren van, F.H., R. Grootendorst, A Systematic Theory of Argumentation. The Pragmadialectical Approach, Cambridge University Press, 2004.10.1017/CBO9780511616389