Robo-advisory as a driving force of the financial market in the light of digitalization?

Author:

Mrkývka Petr1,Šiková Zuzana2

Affiliation:

1. 1 Faculty of Law , Masaryk University , Veveří 158/70 , Brno , Czech Republic

2. 2 Faculty of Law, Masaryk University , Veveří 158/70, Brno , Czech Republic

Abstract

Abstract This article deals with the phenomenon of Robo-advisory used in the provision of investment services. It is appropriate to consider the use of this tool from a regulatory perspective, particularly given the widespread use of digital tools in financial markets and the growing interest of users in the digitization of services. Given the rapid development of digitalization, legislation may not always take into account the use of digital tools. Legislative changes may be delayed. The main objective of this article is to analyze Robo-advisory specifically from the perspective of EU regulation. The aim is to confirm or disprove the hypothesis. Based on the analysis, we are then able to look at using Robo-advisory from different perspectives, both practical and regulatory. The analysis also highlights the similarities and differences between traditional and alternative investment service provision.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

General Medicine

Reference37 articles.

1. Abraham, F, Schmukler, S. L., Tessada, J., 2019. Robo-Advisors: Investing through Machines. In: Research and Policy Briefs., World Bank, No. 21.

2. Anshari, M., Almunawar, M. N., Masri, M., 2022. Digital Twin: Financial Technology‘s Next Frontier of Robo-Advisor. In: Journal of Risk and Financial Management. Vol. 15, https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15040163.

3. BETTER FINANCE. Robo-Advice report, 2020. Robo-Advice 5.0: Can Consumers Trust Robots? Available at: https://betterfinance.eu/wpcontent/uploads/Robo-Advice-Report-2020-25012021.pdf.

4. Bhattacharyya, S, Bhattacharyya, R., 2022. Robo-Advisory Financial Services: A Review of Literature. In: Journal of academic advancement. Vol. 1, Issue No. 1, Pp. 35 – 44.

5. Brenncke, M., 2017. Commentary on MiFID II conduct of business rules, Arts 21-30 MiFID II. Available at: https://deliverypdf.ssrn.com/delivery.php?ID=643118114082091095000005091075081030003031038023006082027093030119086072090065120000037049057099017029005080103073081114081023114053003033058070123027083102127109120059007007123102082008093126117104101127084092108007068122010096013000024007124073066066&EXT=pdf&INDEX=TRUE.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3