Affiliation:
1. Sirindhorn International Institute of Technology , Thammasat University , Thailand , Hokkaido University , Japan
2. Sirindhorn International Institute of Technology , Thammasat University , Thailand
3. Hokkaido University , Japan
Abstract
Abstract
The “Prevention through Design” (PtD) concept considers construction safety during the design process. Several countries are currently practising PtD, including the UK, Singapore, Malaysia, Australia, and the USA, which is still not the case in the Philippines. The study presented in this paper aimed to indicate the current level of awareness of the PtD concept among the structural engineers and purposed to generate a basis of initiatives to introduce or improve the understanding and adoption of PtD in the Philippines. A knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) questionnaire was distributed to survey respondents selected through a snowball sampling method, consisting of structural engineers currently working in the Philippines. Sixty-one (61) structural engineers responded and were analysed in this study. Results indicated that PtD was relatively a new concept for most structural engineers in the Philippines. Similarly, the designers’ knowledge of the concept was still low. However, structural engineers viewed PtD as necessary and its implementation as essential in the construction industry. Despite the known concerns in the PtD implementation, structural engineers favoured the adoption of the concept. The paper also discussed challenges and key drivers for implementing PtD in the Philippines based on the questionnaire results and supporting literature reviews. The findings and methodology presented in this paper could serve as a baseline for a larger sample size covering other design trades, such as architectural, electrical, and mechanical design services leading to the broader adoption of PtD in the Philippines. Furthermore, the framework of this study could also apply to other countries with similar contexts.
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Strategy and Management,Management Information Systems
Reference72 articles.
1. Behm, M. (2012). Safe design suggestions for vegetated roofs. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 138(8), 999-1003. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.000050010.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000500
2. Behm, M., Culvenor, J., & Dixon, G. (2014). Development of safe design thinking among engineering students. Safety Science, 63, 1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2013.10.01810.1016/j.ssci.2013.10.018
3. Behm, M. (2005). Linking construction fatalities to the design for construction safety concept. Safety Science, 43(8), 589-611. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2005.04.00210.1016/j.ssci.2005.04.002
4. Bhagwat, K., Kumar, P., & Delhi, V. S. K. (2021). Usability of visualization platform-based safety training and assessment modules for engineering students and construction professionals. Journal of Civil Engineering Education, 147(2). doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)EI.2643-9115.000003410.1061/(ASCE)EI.2643-9115.0000034
5. Bharadwaj, S., & Deka, S. (2021). Behavioural intention towards investment in cryptocurrency: an integration of Rogers’ diffusion of innovation theory and the technology acceptance model. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 9(4), 137-159. doi: 10.23762/FSO_VOL9_NO4_7
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献