Author:
Jarbou Samir O.,Migdadi Fathi
Abstract
One of the central aims in research on anaphora is to discover the factors that determine the choice of referential expressions in discourse. Ariel (1988; 2001) offers an Accessibility Scale where referential expressions, including demonstratives, are categorized according to the values of anaphoric (i.e. textual) distance that each of these has in relation to its antecedent. The aim of this paper is to test Ariel’s (1988; 1990; 2001) claim that the choice to use proximal or distal anaphors is mainly determined by anaphoric distance. This claim is investigated in relation to singular demonstratives in a corpus of Classical Arabic (CA) prose texts by using word count to measure anaphoric distance. Results indicate that anaphoric distance cannot be taken as a consistent or reliable determinant of how anaphors are used in CA, and so Ariel’s claim is not supported by the results of this study. This also indicates that the universality of anaphoric distance, as a criterion of accessibility, is defied.
Publisher
Uniwersytet Lodzki (University of Lodz)
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Reference46 articles.
1. Ariel, M. 1988. Referring and accessibility. Journal of Linguistics, 24: 65-87.
2. Ariel, M. 1990. Accessing Noun-phrase Antecedents. London: Routledge.
3. Ariel, M. 2001. Accessibility theory: An overview. In T. Sanders, J. Schliperoord and W. Spooren (eds) Text Representation (Human Cognitive Processing Series). Philadelphia and Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 29-87.
4. Beeston, A.1970. The Arabic Language Today. London: Hutchinson.
5. Bentivoglio, P. 1983. Topic continuity and discontinuity in discourse: A study of Spoken Latin American Spanish. In T. Givón (ed) Topic Continuity in Discourse: A Quantitative Cross-Language Study. Philadelphia and Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 255-312.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献