Extracting and Measuring Uncertain Biomedical Knowledge from Scientific Statements

Author:

Guo Xin1234,Chen Yuming56,Du Jian37,Dong Erdan12348

Affiliation:

1. Department of Cardiology and Institute of Vascular Medicine , Peking University Third Hospital , Beijing , China

2. NHC Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Molecular Biology and Regulatory Peptides , Beijing , China

3. Key Laboratory of Molecular Cardiovascular Science, Ministry of Education , Beijing , China

4. Beijing Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Receptors Research , Beijing , China

5. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health , Peking University , Beijing , China

6. Medical Informatics Center , Peking University , Beijing , China

7. National Institute of Health Data Science , Peking University , Beijing , China

8. Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences , Peking University , Beijing , China

Abstract

Abstract Purpose Given the information overload of scientific literature, there is an increasing need for computable biomedical knowledge buried in free text. This study aimed to develop a novel approach to extracting and measuring uncertain biomedical knowledge from scientific statements. Design/methodology/approach Taking cardiovascular research publications in China as a sample, we extracted subject–predicate–object triples (SPO triples) as knowledge units and unknown/hedging/conflicting uncertainties as the knowledge context. We introduced information entropy (IE) as potential metric to quantify the uncertainty of epistemic status of scientific knowledge represented at subject-object pairs (SO pairs) levels. Findings The results indicated an extraordinary growth of cardiovascular publications in China while only a modest growth of the novel SPO triples. After evaluating the uncertainty of biomedical knowledge with IE, we identified the Top 10 SO pairs with highest IE, which implied the epistemic status pluralism. Visual presentation of the SO pairs overlaid with uncertainty provided a comprehensive overview of clusters of biomedical knowledge and contending topics in cardiovascular research. Research limitations The current methods didn’t distinguish the specificity and probabilities of uncertainty cue words. The number of sentences surrounding a given triple may also influence the value of IE. Practical implications Our approach identified major uncertain knowledge areas such as diagnostic biomarkers, genetic polymorphism and co-existing risk factors related to cardiovascular diseases in China. These areas are suggested to be prioritized; new hypotheses need to be verified, while disputes, conflicts, and contradictions need to be settled. Originality/value We provided a novel approach by combining natural language processing and computational linguistics with informetric methods to extract and measure uncertain knowledge from scientific statements.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3