The notion of dominant terminology in bibliometric research-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

The notion of dominant terminology in bibliometric research

Published:2023-09-13 Issue:4 Volume:8 Page:1-7
ISSN:2543-683X
Container-title:Journal of Data and Information Science
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Fassin Yves¹²^ORCID,Rousseau Ronald²³

Affiliation:

1. 1 Department of Marketing, Innovation, and Organisation, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University , Gent , Belgium

2. 2 University of Antwerp, Middelheimlaan 1, Faculty of Social Sciences , Antwerp , Belgium

3. 3 KU Leuven, MSI, Facultair Onderzoekscentrum ECOOM , , Leuven , Belgium

Abstract

Abstract In this opinion paper, we introduce the expressions of dominant terminology and dominant term in the quantitative studies of science in analogy to the notion of dominant design in product development and innovation.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

General Medicine

Link

https://www.sciendo.com/pdf/10.2478/jdis-2023-0020

Reference32 articles.

1. Abernathy, W. J., & Utterback, J. M. (1978). Patterns of industrial innovation. Technology Review, 80(7), 40–47.

2. Abraham, R. H. (1996). Webometry: measuring the complexity of the World Wide Web. Visual Math Institute. University of California at Santa Cruz. Available at: http://www.ralph-abraham.org/vita/redwood/vienna.html

3. Abraham, R. H. (1997). Webometry, measuring the complexity of the World Wide Web. World Futures, 50, 1997, 785–791.

4. Abrahamson, E. (1991). Managerial fads and fashions: The diffusion and rejection of innovations. Academy of Management Review, 16(3), 586–612.

5. Almind, T. C., & Ingwersen, P. (1997). Informetric analyses on the World Wide Web: methodological approaches to ‘webometrics’. Journal of Documentation, 53(4), 404–426.