Can Crossref Citations Replace Web of Science for Research Evaluation? The Share of Open Citations

Author:

Chudlarský Tomáš12,Dvořák Jan12

Affiliation:

1. Czech Technical University in Prague , Computing and Information Centre , Jugoslávských partyzánů 3, CZ-16000 Praha 6 , Czech Republic

2. Charles University , Institute of Information Studies and Librarianship , Na Příkopě 29, CZ-11000 Praha 1 , Czech Republic

Abstract

Abstract Purpose We study the proportion of Web of Science (WoS) citation links that are represented in the Crossref Open Citation Index (COCI), with the possible aim of using COCI in research evaluation instead of the WoS, if the level of coverage was sufficient. Design/methodology/approach We calculate the proportion on citation links where both publications have a WoS accession number and a DOI simultaneously, and where the cited publications have had at least one author from our institution, the Czech Technical University in Prague. We attempt to look up each such citation link in COCI. Findings We find that 53.7% of WoS citation links are present in the COCI. The proportion varies largely by discipline. The total figures differ significantly from 40% in the large-scale study by Van Eck, Waltman, Larivière, and Sugimoto (blog 2018, https://www.cwts.nl/blog?article=n-r2s234). Research limitations The sample does not cover all science areas uniformly; it is heavily focused on Engineering and Technology, and only some disciplines of Natural Sciences are present. However, this reflects the real scientific orientation and publication profile of our institution. Practical implications The current level of coverage is not sufficient for the WoS to be replaced by COCI for research evaluation. Originality/value The present study illustrates a COCI vs WoS comparison on the scale of a larger technical university in Central Europe.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Reference10 articles.

1. La Bruzzo, S., Manghi, P., & Mannocci, A. (2019). OpenAIRE’s DOIBoost—Boosting Crossref for Research. In: Manghi, P., Candela, L., Silvello, G. (eds) Digital Libraries: Supporting Open Science. IRCDL 2019. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 988. Springer, Cham, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-11226-4_11

2. Chudlarský, T., & Dvořák, J. (2019). Can Crossref Citations Replace Web of Science for Research Evaluation? The Share of Open Citations. [poster abstract] In Proceedings of the 17th Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics. (pp. 2551–2552). Rome, Italy: Edizioni Efesto. ISBN 978-88-3381-118-5.

3. Crossref. Retrieved from https://www.crossref.org

4. Dvořák, J., Chudlarský, T., & Špaček, J. (2019). Practical CRIS Interoperability. In 14th International Conference on Current Research Information Systems: Practical CRIS Interoperability. Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V., pp. 256–264. Procedia Computer Science. vol. 146. ISSN 1877-0509. DOI 10.1016/j.procs.2019.01.077

5. van Eck, N.J., Waltman, L., Larivière, V., & Sugimoto, C. (2018). Crossref as a new source of citation data: A comparison with Web of Science and Scopus. Retrieved from https://www.cwts.nl/blog?article=n-r2s234

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3