Affiliation:
1. Publishing Ethics and Research Integrity , Taylor and Francis Group , Journals , UK
Abstract
Abstract
It is imperative that all stakeholders within the research ecosystem take responsibility to improve research integrity and reliability of published research. Based on the unique experiences of a specialist publishing ethics and research integrity team within a major publisher, this article provides insights into the observed trends of misconduct and how those have evolved over time, and addresses key actions needed to improve the interface between researchers, funders, institutions and publishers to collectively improve research integrity on a global scale.
Reference27 articles.
1. Abalkina, A. (2021). Publication and collaboration anomalies in academic papers originating from a paper mill: evidence from a Russia-based paper mill. arXiv:2112.13322v2. https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.13322
2. Bain, L., Ebuenyi, I. D., & Noubiap, J. J. (2022). Research and publication ethics knowledge and practices in the health and life sciences: Findings from an exploratory survey. Ethics, Medicine and Public Health, 23(100803).
3. Bairi, K. E., Kadmiri, N. E., & Fourtassi, M. (2022). Exploring scientific misconduct in Morocco based on an analysis of plagiarism perception in a cohort of 1,220 researchers and students. Accountability in Research, 1–20.
4. Bik, E. M., Casadevall, A., & Fang, F. C. (2016). The Prevalence of Inappropriate Image Duplication in Biomedical Research Publications. MBio, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.00809-16
5. Candal-Pedreira, C., Ross, J. S., Ruano-Ravina, A., Egilman, D. S., Fernández, E., & Pérez-Ríos, M. (2022). Retracted papers originating from paper mills: cross sectional study. BMJ, 379: e071517. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2022-071517
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献