Affiliation:
1. University of Primorska , Koper , Slovenia
2. Borza nepremicnin , Slovenia
Abstract
Abstract
Research purpose. The purpose is to study the household attitudes toward waste separation and prevention and present an innovative model of efficient and sustainable waste management.
Design / Methodology / Approach. In the empirical part, an online survey was implemented to research residents’ attitudes and intentions regarding handling household waste. It resulted in 228 valid responses, used for a quantitative analysis to answer the set hypotheses.
Findings. Regardless of the good results of waste separation in the municipality, the research showed that households do not know how to classify certain waste according to the type properly. It was confirmed that the use of penalty programs does not contribute to a higher level of waste separation. The already high awareness of the importance of separating waste could further be strengthened through the tools of social marketing as a factor for social change.
Originality / Value / Practical implications. It has been proven that residents’ motivation is an important factor that indirectly influences households to separate, prevent and reduce the generation of new amounts of waste. Changing people’s attitudes, mindsets, and behavior to be environmentally friendly is the best way to prevent further encroachment on the natural environment.
Reference27 articles.
1. Adkins, S. (2018). From Disposable Culture to Disposable People: The Unintended Consequences of Plastics. Eugene, Oregon: Whipf and Stock Publishers
2. ARSO: Slovenian Environmental Agency (2022). Environmental Protection: Waste. Available from: https://www.arso.gov.si/en/environmental%20protection/waste/
3. Cole, E.J. & Fieselman, L. (2013). A community-based social marketing campaign at Pacific University Oregon: Recycling, paper reduction, and environmentally preferable purchasing. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 14(2), 176-195. https://doi.org/10.1108/14676371311312888
4. Cornia, A., Sehl, A. & Nielsen, R. K. (2020). We no longer live in a time of separation: A comparative analysis of how editorial and commercial integration became a norm. Journalism, 21(2), 172–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884918779919
5. Eagle, L., Dahl, S. & Low, D. (2020). Ethical dimensions of social marketing and social change. In A.-M. Kennedy (ed.), Macro-Social Marketing Insights: Systems Thinking for Wicked Problems. New York: Routledge, 193-214.10.4324/9780429452307-11
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献