Principal Threats to the Conservation of Running Water Habitats in the Continental Biogeographical Region of Central Europe
Author:
Grzybowski Mirosław1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Department of Tourism, Recreation and Ecology , University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn , Oczapowskiego 5, 10-719 Olsztyn , Olsztyn , Poland
Abstract
Abstract
This paper discusses the threats to the running water habitats that are highly important to biodiversity the European Community in the Continental Biogeographical Region (CBR) of Europe, specifically in Poland. This study covers four water course habitat types distinguished in Natura 2000, which is a network of nature protection areas in the territory (3260, 3220, 3240, 3270 - the code of the habitat, as in Annex I of the Habitat Directive), occurring in 806 Special Areas of Conservation in Poland. Based on a multivariate analysis, we found significant differences in the conservation status of running water habitats resulting from a variety of threats, pressures, and activities. Agriculture has a number of negative impacts on running water habitats, which are most evident for the following habitats: 3260 > 3270. Forest management may have both negative (3260) and positive effects on habitats (3270). Natural system modifications strongly affect habitats 3240, 3270 > 3260. Among the negative anthropogenic influences are pollution (3260 > 3220); human intrusions, disturbances, and tourism (reported most often) (3260, 3270); transportation and service corridors (3260, and 3270); urbanization, residential, and commercial development tourism (3260); biological resource use other than for agriculture and forestry (3270 > 3260); and mining, extraction of materials, and energy production (3270). Geological events and natural catastrophes—most often inundation—were identified as important hazards for habitat 3240. The development of alien and invasive species strongly affects habitats 3240 > 3260, 3270, and natural biotic and abiotic processes affect habitats 3220 > 3260. Negative impacts associated with climate change were detected mostly for habitat 3260. Taking into account the threats identified, a list of recommended practices for running water habitat types is presented, to be considered in habitat conservation programmes.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Nature and Landscape Conservation,Ecology
Reference152 articles.
1. Abell, R., Vigerstol, K., Higgins, J., Kang, S., Karres, N., Lehner, B., Sridhar, A. & Chapin, E. (2019). Freshwater biodiversity conservation through source water protection: Quantifying the potential and addressing the challenges. Aquat Conservhttps://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.3091 2. Agnoletti, M. (2014). Rural landscape, nature conservation and culture: some notes on research trends and management approaches from a (southern) European perspective. Landsc. Urban Plan. 126, 66–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.02.012 3. Amici, V., Landi, S., Frascaroli, F., Rocchini, D., Santi, E. & Chiarucci, A. (2015). Anthropogenic drivers of plant diversity: perspective on land use change in a dynamic cultural landscape. Biodivers. Conserv. 24, 3185–3199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-015-0949-x 4. Auerswald, K., Moyle, P., Seibert, S. P., Geist, J. (2019). HESS Opinions: Socio-economic and ecological trade-offs of flood management – benefits of a transdisciplinary approach. Hydrol. Earth. Syst. Sc. 23, 1035–1044. doi:10.5194/hess-23-1035-2019 5. Babai, D., Toth, A., Szentirmai, I., Biro, M., Mate, A., Demeter, L., Szepligeti, M., Varga, A., Molnar, A., Kun, R. & Molnar, Z. (2015). Do conservation and agri-environmental regulations effectively support traditional small-scale farming in East-Central European cultural landscapes? Biodivers. Conserv. 24, 3305–3327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-015-0971-z
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|