Affiliation:
1. Department of Animal Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture , Kasetsart University , Chatuchak, Bangkok 10900 , Thailand
2. Department of Animal Sciences , University of Florida , Gainesville , 32611 FL, USA
Abstract
Abstract
Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have been used in genomic prediction and shown to increase prediction accuracy and selection responses for economic traits in dairy cattle. The successful report in genomic prediction for improving age at first calving (AFC) and 305-d milk yield (MY) in multibreed dairy population is limited. Therefore, the objective of this research was to compare estimates of variance components, genetic parameters, and prediction accuracies for AFC and MY using a genomic-polygenic model (GPM) and a polygenic model (PM). The AFC and MY records of 9,106 first-lactating multibreed dairy cows, calved between 1991 and 2014, were collected from 1,012 Thai dairy farms. The SNP genotyped individuals were selected from cows that had completed pedigree and phenotypes information. The total genomic DNA samples of 2,661 dairy cattle were genotyped using various GeneSeek Genomic Profiler low-density bead chips (9K, 20K, and 80K). The 2-trait GPM and PM contained herd-year-season and heterosis as fixed effects, and animal additive genetic and residual as random effects. Variance components and genetic parameters were estimated using the procedure of average information-restricted maximum likelihood (AI-REML). Estimates of additive genetic variance components and heritabilities from GPM were higher than PM for AFC and MY. Correlations between AFC and MY were near zero for both models. Mean EBV accuracies were higher for GPM (32.95% for AFC and 38.24% for MY) than for PM (32.65% for AFC, and 32.99% for MY). Mean sire EBV accuracies were higher for GPM (31.35% for AFC and 36.25% for MY) than for PM (28.37% for AFC and 28.80% for MY). Thus, the GPM should be considered the model of choice to increase accuracy of genetic predictions for AFC and MY in the Thai multibreed dairy population.
Reference45 articles.
1. Aguilar I., Misztal I., Johnson D.L., Legarra A., Tsuruta S., Lawlor T.J. (2010). Hot topic: a unified approach to utilize phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information for genetic evaluation of Holstein final score. J. Dairy Sci., 93: 743–752.
2. Bauer J., Vostrý L., Přibyl J., Svitáková A., Zavadilová L. (2014). Approximation of reliability of single-step genomic breeding values for dairy cattle in the Czech Republic. Anim. Sci. Pap. Rep., 32: 301–306.
3. Bauer J., Přibyl J., Vostrý L. (2015). Short communication: reliability of single-step genomic BLUP breeding values by multi-trait test-day model analysis. J. Dairy Sci., 98: 4999–5003.
4. Bohlouli M., Alijani S., Javaremi A.N., König S., Yin T. (2017). Genomic prediction by considering genotype × environment interaction using different genomic architectures. Ann. Anim. Sci., 17: 683–701.
5. Dairy Farming Promotion Organization (2017). DPO sire and dam summary 2017. Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperation, Bangkok, Thailand. pp. 1–106.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献