Toward Preventive Management of Risks Theory: Foundation of Process Structuring the Theory

Author:

Maamir Safa1ORCID,Derghoum Mahfoud2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. High School of Commerce , M.G.I.P.O Laboratory , Kolea, Tipaza, 42003 Kolea, DZ

2. High School of Commerce , M.G.I.P.O Laboratory , Kolea, Tipaza, 420003 Kolea, DZ

Abstract

Abstract The preventive management of risks in enterprises has a pivotal role in preserving the value created in the business processes. Despite the notable importance of this area of study, it has received little attention from researchers. A deep investigation and analysis of the literature on risk management led to reveal that there is a need for a solid foundation of preventive management of risks theory. Although the contribution of the previous studies in the area of preventive management of risks, by identifying the pillars that constitute it, and highlighting the contribution of the integration of risk management and knowledge management in preventing risks. However, we may only consider these studies as preliminary steps in the development of this new field since they did not justify the integration of different disciplines to generate a new one. Moreover, they did not provide any operational process that structures this paradigm. Thus, we aim through the present study to take one further step in the foundation of preventive management of risks and to develop an operational process that regulates this field by coupling a knowledge management process with the process of the integrated management of risks and business processes. This integration has followed a rigorous and strict methodology to justify and accept the integration of two separated fields in one single field as a scientific and valid foundation. This research has succeeded to provide theoretical implications and a conceptual model for preventive management of risks, which triggers the need for empirical implications to improve the outcomes of this study.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Reference33 articles.

1. Aldin, L., & De Cesare, S. (2009). A comparative analysis of business process modelling techniques. 14th annual UK association of information systems conference AIS, Oxford university. https://aisel.aisnet.org/ukais2009/2

2. Bank for International Settlements, Basel Committee on Banking. (2003). Sound Practices for the Management and Supervision of Operational Risk. https://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs96.htm

3. Becerra-Fernandez, I., & Sabherwal, R. (2010). knowledge management: Systems and processes. M.E Sharpe, INC.

4. Becker, J., Rosemann, M., & Von Uthmann, C. (2000). Guidlines of business process modeling. In W. M. Aalst, J. Desel, & A. Oberweis (Eds.), Business Process Management: Models, Techniques, and Empirical Studies (2nd 30-49). Springer-Verlag.

5. Bhatt, G. D. (2001). Knowledge management in organizations: examining the interaction between technologies, techniques, and people. Journal of Knowledge Management, 5(1), 68-75. https://doi.org/10.1108/1367327011038441910.1108/13673270110384419

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3