Affiliation:
1. Department of Cardiology , Karaman Training and Research Hospital , Karaman , Turkey
2. Department of Cardiology , “Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey” University School of Medicine , Karaman , Turkey
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Coronary artery disease is one of the most common causes of death in the world. The outcome of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction is influenced by many factors, and the time elapsed from symptom onset to diagnosis and reperfusion have a critical role in this regard.
Aim
The aim of this study was to investigate the differences in the diagnosis-to-needle times of patients with STEMI presenting to the hospital during and outside of working hours, and the effect of this relationship on in-hospital clinical events.
Methods
This retrospective study analyzed the data of 50 patients admitted for emergency primary percutaneous coronary intervention. We assessed pain onset-to-diagnosis times and diagnosis-to-needle times, and evaluated their relationship with troponin values at admission and after 48 h.
Results
The mean age of the patients was 55.64 ± 13.72 years. In total, 60% of the patients presented outside of working hours. Mean patient delay time from the onset of chest pain to seeking medical help was 2.64 ± 2.47 h. Mean troponin values were 4.39 ± 5.26 ng/ml at admission and 36.50 ± 12.95 ng/ml after 48 h. Mean post-angiography ejection fraction values were 47.36 ± 6.53%. We found a statistically significant difference in the pain onset-to-diagnosis and diagnosis-to-needle times of patients who presented to the hospital during and outside of working hours. We found a positive correlation between diagnosis-to-needle times and the troponin values of patients, and a statistically significant difference between pain onset-to-diagnosis times of patients who presented during and outside of working hours (p < 0.05). Although the relationship between the diagnosis-to-needle time and troponin elevation after 48 h was strong (97%), the relationship between pain onset-to-diagnosis time and troponin elevation after 48 h was weak (8%), suggesting that the duration of surgical intervention is much more important than the time until the first medical contact.
Conclusions
In this study, there was a statistically significant difference in the pain onset-to-diagnosis and diagnosis-to-needle times of patients who presented to the hospital during and outside of working hours.
Reference21 articles.
1. Foo RS, De Bono DP. Concepts in acute coronary syndrome. Singapore Med J. 2000;41(12):606–610.
2. Acharya P, Adhikari RR, Bhattarai J, Shrestha NR, Sharma SK, Karki P. Delayed presentation of acute coronary syndrome: a challenge in its early management. JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2009;48(173):1–4. doi: 10.31729/jnma.173.
3. Rogers FJ. The clinical spectrum of acute coronary syndromes. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2000;100(11):1–7.
4. Rosengren A, Wallentin L, K Git A, Behar S, Battler A. Sex, age, and clinical presentation of acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2004;25(8):663–670. doi: 10.1016/j.ehj.2004.02.023.
5. Diop D, Aghababian RV. Definition, classification, and pathophysiology of acute coronary ischemic syndromes. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2001;19(2):259–267. doi: 10.1016/S0733-8627(05)70182-6.