Affiliation:
1. Laboratorio de Radiactividad Natural (LARUC) , Universidad de Cantabria , Santander , España .
2. Siglo 21 Consultores SL, A Coruña, España .
Abstract
Abstract
Radon is a naturally occurring radioactive gas, which tends to accumulate inside built structures. It is therefore necessary to include techniques to mitigate radon concentration during refurbishing work. The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness of a number of mitigation techniques, under real conditions, to determine which is most suitable, in each case, for use in rebuilding solutions. The methodology consisted in performing four experimental tests on mitigation strategies recommended by the Código Técnico de la Edificación (Technical Building Code) (CTE-DB-HS6) and by the Government of the Autonomous Community of Galicia, (Xunta de Galicia, 2018). The concentration was measured with three different systems: radon in soil at 80 cm, passive detectors to confirm mean concentration, and continuous monitoring by devices calibrated at the LaRUC Laboratory of the University of Cantabria, in order to compare the results of the tests. The experiments were carried out in premises located in a high radiation area in Arteixo (La Coruña, Spain). Four experimental models were designed, corresponding to each of the building solutions under study, and tested over a period of 16 days in two repeated series of trials. The results obtained show that, of the different strategies tested, pressurising the living space achieves an efficient reduction of the radon concentration with a significant simplicity of construction. This solution, compatible with the minimal intervention and reversibility principles stablished in the charters of Venice, Krakovia and Nara, is shown to be especially useful when work is carried out on structures considered to be part of protected heritage.
Reference23 articles.
1. [1] BARROS-DIOS, J. M. - BARREIRO, M. A. - RUANO-RAVINA, A. - FIGUEIRAS, A.: Exposure to residential radon and lung cancer in Spain: a population-based case-control study. American Journal of Epidemiology, Vol. 156(6), 2002, pp. 548–555.10.1093/aje/kwf070
2. [2] SAMET, J. M.: Radon and lung cancer. J. Natl. Cancer Inst, 81, 1989, pp. 745–757.10.1093/jnci/81.10.745
3. [3] DARBY, S. - HILL, D. - AUVINEN, A. - BARROS-DIOS, J. M. - BAYSSON, H. - BOCHICCHIO, F. - DEO, H. - FALK, R. - FORASTIERE, F. - HAKAMA, M.: Radon in homes and risk of lung cancer: collaborative analysis of individual data from 13 European case-control studies. B.M.J., doi: 10.1136/bmj.38308.477650.63.10.1136/bmj.38308.477650.63
4. [4] BRANION-CALLES, M. C. - NELSON, T. A. - HENDERSON, S. B.: Evaluation of different radon guideline values based on characterization of ecological risk and visualization of lung cancer mortality trends in British Columbia, Canada. BMC Public Health, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-2438-2.10.1186/s12889-015-2438-2
5. [5] EUROPEAN COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 2013/59/Euratom on Basic Safety Standards for Protection against the Dangers Arising from Exposure to Ionising Radiation and Repealing Directives 89/618/Euratom, 90/641/Euratom, 96/29/Euratom, 97/43/Euratom and 2003/122/Euratom. Off. J. Eur. Union 2014, L13, 1–73. Available online: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2013/59/oj (accessed on 26 September 2018).
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献