Predicting Financial Risk Tolerance and Risk-Taking Behaviour: A Comparison of Questionnaires and Tests

Author:

Grable John E.1,Hubble Amy,Kruger Michelle,Visbal Melissa

Affiliation:

1. The University of Georgia , 205 Dawson Hall , Athens , GA , Georgia

Abstract

ABSTRACT The purpose of this study was to compare and contrast the concurrent, convergent, and predictive validity of a variety of risk tolerance tests and questionnaires. The tested measures represent tests and scales derived from economic and psychometric theory. It was determined that tests based on economic theory had similar predictive power, implying that economic measures provided some degree of convergent validity across measures. Only the psychometric risk tolerance measure, however, was found to be correlated to other indicators of risk tolerance and risk-taking. Results from this exploratory study suggest that a questionnaire developed using psychometric theory appears to offer superior predictive insight into financial risk-taking, at least when compared across the measurement techniques examined in this study.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Reference38 articles.

1. Adamowicz, W, Louviere, J & Williams, M 1994, ‘Combining revealed and stated preferences methods for valuing environmental amenities’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, vol. 26, pp. 271–292.

2. Ahmad, A, Safwan, N, Ali, M & Tabasum, A 2011, ‘How demographic characteristics affect the perception of investors about financial risk tolerance’, Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 412–417.

3. ASIC 2011, Review of financial advice industry practice, Australian Securities & Investments Commission, Brisbane, QLD.

4. ASIC 2017, Risk management systems of responsible entities, Australian Securities & Investments Commission, Brisbane, QLD.

5. Barsky, RB, Juster, FT, Kimball, MS & Shapiro, MD 1997, ‘Preference parameters and behavioral heterogeneity: an experimental approach in the health and retirement study’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 112, pp. 537–579.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3