Affiliation:
1. Doctoral School of Cybernetics and Statistics , The Bucharest University of Economic Studies , Romania
Abstract
Abstract
This study develops a scorecard validation model for evaluating key Artificial Intelligence (AI) indexes, aiming to provide a comprehensive framework for assessing the multifaceted nature of AI development. Focusing on four significant AI indexes and one AI report from 2021 to 2023, the research employs both expert judgment and advanced text mining techniques, including k-means clustering. This dual approach facilitates a detailed examination of AI indexes, highlighting their strengths, weaknesses, and overall market comprehensiveness. The findings contribute to understanding the AI sector’s evolution, offering critical insights for policy formulation and strategic decision-making in AI. Acknowledging the inherent subjectivity in the evaluation process and potential data biases, the paper suggests future research avenues, including cross-sectoral and regional analyses of AI trends and a deeper exploration of ethical considerations in AI. This study serves as a valuable resource for stakeholders navigating the complex AI landscape, providing a structured method for comparing and understanding AI advancements.
Reference28 articles.
1. Anagnoste, S., 2017. Robotic Automation Process-The next major revolution in terms of back-office operations improvement, in: Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence. pp. 676–686.
2. Bequé, A., Coussement, K., Gayler, R. and Lessmann, S., 2017. Approaches for credit scorecard calibration: An empirical analysis. Knowledge-Based Systems, 134, 213-227.
3. Blei, D. M., Ng, A. Y. and Jordan, M. I., 2003. Latent Dirichlet Allocation. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3, 993–1022.
4. Bonnet, D., Westerman, G., 2020. The New Elements of Digital Transformation. MIT Sloan Management Review.
5. Crone, S. F., Lessmann, S., and Stahlbock, R. 2006. The impact of preprocessing on data mining: An evaluation of classifier sensitivity in direct marketing. European Journal of Operational Research, 173(3), 781-800.