Usability of a telerehabilitation program for patients with musculoskeletal or oncological diseases: A mixed-methods evaluation / Benutzerfreundlichkeit eines Telerehabilitations-Programmes für Patient*innen mit muskuloskelettalen oder onkologischen Erkrankungen: Eine Mixed-Methods Evaluation
Author:
Stöhr Doreen1, Matzka Martin1, Gschwenter Stefan1, Edlmayer Alexandra1, Felder David1, Spary Andreas2, Reiger Gabriele3, Honegger Martina4, Skoumal Martin4
Affiliation:
1. Pension Insurance Institution, Department for Applied Research, Innovation and Medical Service Development , Vienna , Austria 2. Pension Insurance Institution, Center for Outpatient Rehabilitation , Graz , Austria 3. Pension Insurance Institution, Rehabilitation Center Weyer , Weyer , Austria 4. Pension Insurance Institution, Department for Scientific Research in Rehabilitation , Vienna , Austria
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
Telerehabilitation may stabilize the results of a previous phase 2 rehabilitation program through remote rehabilitation sessions. We evaluated a new telerehabilitation service (PV RehaTRAIN®) during its initial implementation, focusing on its usability both from the perspective of patients with musculoskeletal or oncological diseases and the interdisciplinary treatment team.
Methods
The evaluation followed a convergent mixed-methods design. After separate qualitative and quantitative analyses of the multi-perspective findings from interviews, focus groups and questionnaires, we interpreted the results collectively and equally.
Results
Overall, the results indicate high acceptance of and satisfaction with the new telerehabilitation service, especially from the patients’ perspective and regarding educational and individual counselling sessions. However, the treatment team identified a need for further didactic training to enable them to realize their full professional potential in a telerehabilitation setting.
Conclusion
The new telerehabilitation service PV RehaTRAIN® may bridge gaps in health care for patients who do not have access to conventional phase 3 rehabilitation infrastructure or prefer remote services that are readily integrated into their everyday lives. Members of the interdisciplinary treatment team offering telerehabilitation for the first time need adequate technical and especially setting-specific didactic training. Increased participation of treatment teams when refining telerehabilitation systems may minimize problems in early implementation phases and contribute to the quality of care.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Reference24 articles.
1. Amin, J., Ahmad, B., Amin, S., Siddiqui, A. A., & Alam, M. K. (2022). Rehabilitation professional and patient satisfaction with telerehabilitation of musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review. BioMed Research International. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7366063 2. Caughlin, S., Mehta, S., Corriveau, H., Eng, J. J., Eskes, G., Kairy, D., Meltzer, J., Sakakibara, B. M., & Teasell, R. (2020). Implementing telerehabilitation after stroke: lessons learned from Canadian trials. Telemedicine and e-Health, 26(6), 710–719. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2019.0097 3. Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory. Sage Publications. 4. Cottrell, M. A., Galea, O. A., O’Leary, S. P., Hill, A. J., & Russell, T. G. (2017). Real-time telerehabilitation for the treatment of musculoskeletal conditions is effective and comparable to standard practice: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Rehabilitation, 31(5), 625–638. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215516645148 5. Cox, N. S., Dal Corso, S., Hansen, H., McDonald, C. F., Hill, C. J., Zanaboni, P., Alison, J. A., O’Halloran, P., Macdonald, H., & Holland, A. E. (2021). Telerehabilitation for chronic respiratory disease. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (1). https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD013040.pub2
|
|