Providing care to long-term mechanically ventilated patients in Germany – Current situation and needs for action from the perspective of health professionals / Die Versorgung langzeitbeatmeter Patienten in Deutschland – Aktuelle Situation und Handlungsbedarfe aus der Sicht von Gesundheitsberufsangehörigen

Author:

Lehmann Yvonne1,Stark Susanne1,Ewers Michael1

Affiliation:

1. Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin , Institut für Gesundheitsund Pflegewissenschaft , Berlin , Germany

Abstract

Abstract Background The number of patients depending on long-term invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) has been increasing for several years. Anecdotal reports indicate heterogeneous health structures, opaque patient pathways, nontransparent and sometimes questionable practices in individual areas of care, inadequate quality standards and control mechanisms in Germany. However, there is hardly any empirical data on this topic. Aim To report findings from a qualitative study conducted as part of a complex research project to assess the appropriateness of care provided to IMV patients in Germany. Methods Thirteen semi-structured expert interviews were conducted with 22 health professionals providing care for IMV patients. The data analysis was conducted with MAXQDA according to the framework by Meuser and Nagel. Results Interviewees emphasized similar healthcare deficits. They considered health providers to be nontransparent and influenced by secondary interests. Quality of care is reported to be jeopardized by shortage of trained staff. Warranty of self-determination and participatory decision-making is not a matter of fact. Clarifying issues of sustaining life, quality of life and shaping the end of life is often ignored. The professionals are familiar with the patient pathways, allocation processes and responsibilities described in existing guidelines, but criticize the fact that they are not sufficiently binding. Accordingly, patient pathways are frequently individual results of experience-based, informal networking, and often left to chance. Conclusions The results point to a considerable need for action to reach an appropriate, integrated, patient-centered level of care for long-term IMV patients and ensure its quality.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Reference39 articles.

1. Advisory Council – Advisory Council on the Assessment of Developments in the Health System. Needs-based Healthcare (2014). Opportunities for Rural Regions and Selected Health Sectors, Report 2014, Abridged Version. https://www.svr-gesundheit.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Gutachten/2014/SVR-Gutachten_2014_Kurzfassung_engl.pdf [last access: 22.12.2019].

2. Ambrosino, N. & Vitacca, M. (2018). The patient needing prolonged mechanical ventilation: a narrative review. Multidiscip Respir Med 13, Art. 6.

3. Baxter, S., Johnson, M., Chambers, D., Sutton, A., Goyder, E. & Booth, A. (2018). The effects of integrated care: a systematic review of UK and international evidence. BMC Health Serv Res 18(1), Art. 350.

4. Bundessozialgericht (1999). Urteil B 3 KR 4/98 R. vom 28. Januar 1999. https://lexetius.com/1999,1453 [last access: 22.12.2019].

5. Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin (2019). Neubekanntmachung der Satzung der Ethikkommission der Medizinischen Fakultät in der Fassung vom 22. März 2019. Amtliches Mitteilungsblatt der Charité Nr. 230, 27.03.2019.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3