Design for learning in the third space: opportunities and challenges

Author:

Ferrari Simona1ORCID,Triacca Serena1ORCID,Braga Gianluca1

Affiliation:

1. Catholic University of the Sacred Heart , Italy

Abstract

Abstract Many educational agents offer paths that allow school to turn itself into a ‘third space’. Caritas Ambrosiana, based on a ‘pedagogy of facts’, proposes interventions to promote soft skills in schools. This non-formal education agency committed Research Center about Media Education, Innovation and Technology (CREMIT) of Catholic University for a project to improve their school programme and training effectiveness. We chose the participatory action research paradigm to verify how to design an educational path by applying third-space principles in the school context and how digital media can be embedded into the practice to enable a more porous exchange of experiences and expertise between students, educators and the school curriculum. The accompanying plan was designed on the basis of the initial questionnaire data analysis: sociomateriality was the main focus because it was considered by Caritas educators as one of the least important elements to include in the design process. The second reason is the need to rethink on-site training formats to face the challenges of the Covid-19 emergency. As expected, after the training intervention, sociomateriality had a significant growth in the design practices. The other third-space pedagogy elements (peering, experiential orientation, motivation, pleasure of making together) are maintained and reinforced, thanks to digital literacy.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Reference27 articles.

1. Ardizzone, P., Rivoltella, P.C. (2004). Didattiche per l’e-learning. Roma: Carocci.

2. Bhabha, H.K. (1990). The Third Space. In J. Rutherford (Eds.), Identity, Community, Culture, Difference (pp. 207–221). London: Lawrence & Wishart.

3. Bhabha, H.K. (1994). The Location of Culture. London: Routledge.

4. Bassey, M. (1998). Action research for improving educational practice. In R. Halsall, Teacher Research and School Improvement: Opening Doors from the Inside (pp. 93-108). Buckingham: Open University Press.

5. Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9, 27-40.10.3316/QRJ0902027

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3