Modelling Pedestrian Crossing Behaviour at a Midblock Section

Author:

Poojari Yugendar1,Prashanth E.1,Divya D.1,Kalyani M.1

Affiliation:

1. Dept. of Civil Engineering , Chaitanya Bharathi Institute of Technology , Telangana , India

Abstract

Abstract In general, pedestrians want to cross a road at a mid-block section instead of intersections because it is the shortest route. According to an Indian scenario, most of the crosswalks in urban areas are not signalised and controlled. In this study, the crossing behaviour of pedestrians in terms of speed at a midblock section was studied by considering several parameters. Statistical tests such as ANOVA and Pearson correlation tests were performed in order to know the effect of parameters on the crossing speed of a pedestrian. The pedestrian’s age and gender, crossing type, pattern, time, number of stops, number of two wheelers, three wheelers, light and heavy commercial vehicles, and groups significantly affect their crossing speed. A multiple linear regression model was developed by considering the most significant parameters. The mean absolute percentage error, root mean square error, and R2 values were calculated to validate the models.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Reference20 articles.

1. Kadali, B.R. - Vedagiri, P. (2013) Marked versus unmarked pedestrian road crossing behaviour at uncontrolled midblock crosswalk in mixed traffic condition. Proceedings of 92nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board (Compendium of Papers, CDROM), No. 13–2943.

2. Chandra, S. - Rajat, R. - Das, V.R. (2013) Descriptive and parametric analysis of pedestrian gap acceptance in mixed traffic conditions. J Civ Eng 18(1):284–293.

3. Chu, X. - Guttenplan, M. - Baltes, M.R. (2004) Why people cross where they do: The role of street environment. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the transportation research board, no. 1878 (pp. 3-10), Washington, D.C.

4. Daaman, W. - Hoogendorn, S.P. (2007) Pedestrian free speed behavior in crossing flows. Traffic and Granular Flow ’05, A. Schadschneider, T. Pöschel, R. Kühane, M. Schreckenberg, and D. E. Wolf, eds., Springer, Berlin, 299–304.

5. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). (2003) Manual of uniform traffic control devices for streets and highways, Washington, DC.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3